Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Relentlessnes: I may not have the IQ-eyness I had before my 3rd wave of braindamage, but by being relentless, I keep improving, however sluggishly, while the entitlement-coasting people don't.
Excellence-of-studies: don't waste time studying mediochre means: study the best-of-the-best, from Simon Sinek, to Kegan & Lahey, to the best books in whatever your domain is.
It's 99% perspiration, & only 1% inspiration, except for a very few.
( there are 2 categories of "genius":
Relentlessly earning greater competence improves your standing against the quicker ones, through the years,
but it does nothing in relation to the "wizards" who just are using some dimension that you don't have, to get where they do.
In Gleick's book "Genius" about Richard Feynman, there was a situation where a normal physicist worked for 1/2y, aka 365/2 days, roughly, to earn a theory .. & he presented it.
Feynman wasn't at that lecture .. & only heard about it, but that night, he blasted through the calculus until he got it, then .. the next morning, he hunted-down & accosted the physicist who'd given that lecture, & presented him with his rendition of the work, saying "is that what you got?" .. horrified, the guy discovered that Feynman had taken the theory farther in 1/2-day than he had in 365/2 days .. you can't compete with wizards.
Mlodinow also encountered this, as is in his book about being mentored by Feynman: he & his work-partner earned, in months of work, some .. quantum-optics meaning, iirc.
He got Feynman to consider it, for 1/2h.
In that 1/2h, Feynman got enough understanding that he told them: "publish. you're not making any mistakes, & the established contradicting-your-work theory therefore is likely wrong"..
How he got THAT far, in that-little time, .. normals can't compete against that.
So, simply don't bother!!
Compete against the normal ones!
Leave the "supernatural" skill stuff to the people who've got the synaesthesia, or whatever, to do it, to them.
They're rare, & not the ones who do most of the work, in any domain, right?
All the people working on important stuff, who are grinding-through obstacles, that's important!
The best framing I ever encountered was this:
Airbus's working on a new powerplant-system.
2,000 engineers assigned to that work!!
Can you imagine anything being so hellishly-complicated that it takes THAT much engineering-force to get it to reliably, & certifiably, work??
THEY'RE ALL CONTRIBUTING!!
See?
The woman who solves how to make the turbulences in the 1st-layer of turbine-blades NOT erode the 1st-layer of stator-vanes, if that's all she accomplishes, it was important!
I once spoke with a woman who managed engineers who built an instrument that ended-up on a Viking lander, on Mars, last-century..
The engineers were prone to heading out to the bar, after tough days, to relax, with the work-gang..
.. & then they'd get talking about the problem, again, & when they'd found a new angle to be working on it, again, then they'd head back to work, instead of going home to their families!
There, too, is another "competitive-advantage", but one with high human-cost: being autistic.
You don't need to be either a "wizard" or autistic, to compete: you only need to make your-part of the work important enough for it to make good-enough difference, see? )
Don't bother being what you aren't, & recognize that sociopathy has gained ownership of much of the workplace, so "it ISN'T you" that is the problem, in many cases.
Trust that good work counts, trust that airliners exist, & trust that THE advantage that the Wright Brothers had, was simply in being systematic, methodically eradicating bugs, until they got the photographs of controlled-turning that they needed to prove their system worked.
In STEM, be systematic.
Be methodical.
Eradicate bugs.
https://www.amazon.com/Debugging-Indispensable-Software-Hardware-Problems-ebook/dp/B00PDDKQV2/ is a book which can give you the principles of being more effective in getting results in STEM.
Do well,
_ /\ _
Why are people downvoting this? I might quibble with 1 or 2 points, but it's good advice. (no, really, I'm interested in knowing why people are downvoting this...)
I suspect that it is because it's a wall of text (lemmers don't like long posts) and if you scan through it looking to see if it is worth reading, it comes off as a crazed rant. The way he has it formatted, the sentences he puts exclamations on, just the things that catch your eye come across as sketchy.
Yeah, I didn't downvote bc this one seems benign, but this person's MO is to go on unhinged rants masquerading as enlightenment. I wouldn't be surprised if some people just see the username and downvote.
Thanks for the info, I understand the perspective.