this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2026
511 points (99.6% liked)

News

36233 readers
3217 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1dalm@lemmings.world -3 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

This is what I was saying last Friday when the memo dropped. The memo was a nothing burger. Functionally nothing changed about the program. Hegseth got nothing he wanted.

People online just can't help themselves from losing their minds. Literally anything can make people lose their minds. A headline could be "Hegseth declare that all banana splits served to troops be gendered as male" and y'all would lose your minds like clockwork.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 23 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

"Hegseth declare that all banana splits served to troops be gendered as male"

Yeah, I would absolutely take issue with the head of a government institution saying something like that. That is a bonkers thing to say as a public official and should invoke some kind of mental health check.

I'm aware Hegseth is just posturing for brownie points with this Scouts thing, but this kind of behavior should not be normalized. I still remember when Howard Dean lost his bid to be a presidential candidate because he got too excited during a speech.

[–] 1dalm@lemmings.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I would absolutely take issue with the head of a government institution saying something like that.

Yeah. He knows that. That's exactly why he does it. How do y'all not know their playbook by now? There are only two plays.

  1. Do evil Nazi shit.
  2. Say stupid shit online to keep the press and liberal Internet circles distracted from the evil Nazi shit.

That's the whole playbook.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)
  1. Do evil Nazi shit.
  2. Say more evil Nazi shit online to... distract people from the other evil Nazi shit?

That's not a playbook. That's an evil Nazi doing evil Nazi shit and then never letting us forget that he's an evil Nazi.

[–] 1dalm@lemmings.world -2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

But while you should focus on the no. 1 stuff, you are far too easily distracted by the no. 2 stuff.

The Scouts news this weekend is a perfect example. Functionally nothing changed in the program, but they are able to make you go insane like a puppet.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

It's a signal for what they want to do to the program, and the government has a lot of ways to pressure Scouts to make it happen. It's a distraction until it becomes reality, like all the other evil Nazi shit they do. This is how they signal their future plans, just like forcing us out of sports and forcing us into the wrong bathroom and taking away our identification paperwork and putting us in men's prisons and then taking away our hormones when we're in prison. They push push push until they get what they want.

They're evil Nazis and they want to exterminate all trans people. This is just another thing they want to do, and if we let them, they will.

But I'm just a stupid fucking puppet, what the fuck do I know?

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

They didn't change much, but there were changes made and not insignificant ones, and theyre using some really weasely words to mask that.

They have done away with the Citizenship in Society merit badge, which was a relatively new badge, but was also a required badge to earn eagle. This was a badge that basically focused on the importance of DEI.

They've also agreed to add a "military service" merit badge. Not a whole lot of details yet about what exactly that will entail or if it will be a required badge or not.

It also sounds like they'll be making youths register accordingly to their biological gender as opposed to the one they actually identify as, and will need to use facilities like bathrooms and share tents and such with other scouts that corresponds to that.

It's not massive changes, but it's certainly enough that you should be pissed about them. And hegseth has indicated he wants to reevaluate in a few months and likely will be pushing for even more changes.

I'm an eagle scout, I'm fucking pissed about this, it goes against all of the good values I learned from scouts for them to give into this pressure, and I'm sure that when kegsbreath comes back around in 6 months or so they'll cave even more.

I'm sending my eagle medal back in protest.

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Hi, venturing silver here (sending that shit back, too). Do you have a handy link to all of these changes that I can send to my old scout buddies?

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Also thank you for showing real scout spirit and taking this seriously.

I've been talking to a lot of other eagles and other former scouts, and so far none of them have been happy about this. I have a couple other people also planning to return their medals, and a few who can't find their medals or who are (understandably) reluctant to do so but are at least planning to write some letters and make some noise over this.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

I don't have a specific link to share, I've been following this whole situation for a few weeks now since it was all first announced. There's a lot of articles being written about it now, your best bet is probably just to see what your favorite trusted news sources are saying.

[–] 1dalm@lemmings.world -5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

They did away with one merit badge and added one elective. "DEI" is baked throughout the scout program and basically all the topics covered in that one merit badge are covered in lots of other parts the program. Including the whole point of the scout law.

You are losing your mind over nothing. Get a grip.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

"DEI" is baked throughout the scout program

And do you really think that they're not going to try to come after that too? They're already leaving the door open for them to come back and put more pressure on scouting in a few months, and Drinky Pete has pretty clearly said that he hopes the organization will go back to being the boy scouts.

When someone tells you who they are, believe them.

Also really convenient of you to just ignore the concerns about trans youths. I'm sure you're not pushing an agenda here /s

[–] 1dalm@lemmings.world -5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, I do think they are dropping this issue. I think Hegseth realized that he wasn't going to get the traction on this he wanted so he agreed a nothing burger and declared victory for himself.

I'm not ignoring the concerns of the Trans youth, it's just that the "demands" won't actually change them. The BSA has already issued a statement that trans youth are still welcome in scouting. No one is going to be checking anyone's birth certificates. Literally nothing changed.

Get a grip.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe you're right, and I'll have sent my medal away for nothing, in which case I'm down a prized but essentially useless trinket.

Or maybe I'm right, in which case I'm either ridding myself of a symbol of an organization I'll no longer wish to be associated with soon, or maybe, just maybe I'm doing something that helps to prevent that from happening.

If you're right, I'll feel a little silly and otherwise continue my life as normal, content that I at least stood up for something I believe in.

But what will you do if I'm right? How would you feel knowing that you brushed this off as a non-issue if girls and trans youth, and maybe eventually other "undesirables" are eventually kicked out of scouts, when their commitment to dei wavers, and maybe they're even twisted into a militaristic, nationalist organization like some modern Hitler Youth?

[–] tomselleck@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not the person your reply is to, but you’re spot on about where this is headed. From the DOD’s initial statement about Scouting America, it’s obvious that they want it to go back to excluding girls from the organization. As a current den leader, I was already dissatisfied with the way the organization is being run, and this is probably the final straw for me to just step away from them completely. Leadership is acting like cowards while also asking for donations. It’s incredibly disappointing.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I'm honestly a little conflicted about how people like you who are still actively involved in scouting should react to this.

On the one hand, yeah, screw the organization, they don't deserve support for this kind of stuff.

On the other hand, it's about the kids, and I do overall believe that the core values of scouting and the kind of structure it can provide are great things for a lot of kids to experience. There are other ways to provide that sort of program, but scouting is already there, and it makes more sense to me to try to preserve and improve that than to try to start something else from scratch.

And good adult leaders can do a lot to insulate their units from the bullshit from higher-up. I know my troop wasn't at all afraid to bend or even outright break the rules when it made sense to do so (I actually remember first learning the term "plausible deniability" from one of my leaders,) and being active at the district or council level can help put pressure from the inside (back in the 90s my local council actually tried to force the issue and allow gay scouts to join, they got shot down by national but imagine if more councils would have stepped up to do that.) Good leaders with their heads on straight leaving scouting will just result in the organization collapsing into exactly what we don't want it to be.

I'm not currently active in scouting, I don't have kids and my schedule doesn't really work with it these days to be active as a leader, so all I can do is try to make some noise from the outside leaning on my experience as an eagle scout and former leader. I have nothing to lose but also very little leverage. People like you have more leverage, but also not much to lose- absolute worst case scenario they find an excuse to kick you out, but if you don't succeed at making change from the inside you were probably going to leave anyway.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 4 points 13 hours ago

Except there's the whole "military leader threatens a private organization" thing.