this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
156 points (99.4% liked)

Hardware

6463 readers
60 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Consumer PCs have long abandoned the multi-GHz race for core count and NPU inflation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Definitely. The prices were much higher (accounting for inflation) though, and to make it worse with everything moving so fast it all was obsolete so much quicker.

Today you can ride a high end gaming PC 6-8 years. Imagine taking a Win98/EarlyXP machine to Windows 7. Nah.

But we lost the excitement with the longevity.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

with everything moving so fast it all was obsolete so much quicker.

*looking confused in Linux user since 1998* ;-)

My first real PC from 1996 was a Pentium 100 which admittedly wasn't cheap (~1800€ today including inflation), but had an easy and low-price upgrade path to a K6-2 400 with decent amount of RAM which was later being used by my father until 2010.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

1996...used until 2010

It's super cool to use stuff like that. What did he use it for, word processing? I don't think the average consumer of 2010 would've found it adequate though. That was the height of flash-filled websites and multimedia.

My dad did mostly some word processing and web browsing on his favorite bunch of sites.
Processing power was less a problem in the end than the very limited memory (192 MB), even with the super-small-footprint Linux Distro.
You have to remember, 2008/2009 also was the time of the EEE-PCs, that weren't that much more powerful compute-wise, but already had at least 1GB of memory...