this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
732 points (97.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

25629 readers
533 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I hope everyone who wants to be on permanent DST experiences an eternity of the first day of spring forward, never rested again

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wasn't actually alive at the time, thanks for those details! I didn't know why they hated it, just that they must have to have switched back so fast.

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I also wasn't alive (I know most of it from my parents and the internet, but I've also had this conversation on the other place before.

I get the reasons why people like one or the other. I wake up at 3 am for work 5 days a week and I work 10 hour days so my feelings on the matter will be skewed no matter what, but it always seems like a majority of people want to go to standard DST when it's a hypothetical and there's not a good general consensus for why they switch back if it is tried.

I believe Mexico (might be another South American country), did have it and they swapped back due to the "health benefits" but it seems like a lot of the studies around day lights savings time as a whole are relying on supposition and don't have a long term study for the actual effects.

Some studies show more car accidents, some show less, some show nuance. some studies show better or more economical use of utilities like water and rlectro, some show the opposite, or that there is no change.

Some studies show health benefits but those studies assume we don't change sleeping schedules and so on to accommodate/ take advantage of more light, and often the health detriments are based on swapping back and forth twice a year.

Most of this comment I made after reading more articles on it rather than going off memory from the last time I had this conversation, and so what I say here may not necessarily match up with what's in the original comment.

If I remember I'll try to go back up and change that comment to better reflect the new info.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You should read more into this. The detrimental health effects aren't linked to going permantly to DST, but from switching back and forth between DST and standard time.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You don't have to report back to me that you read more on the subject.

But if you are going to do that, please go back and more thoroughly read what I actually said in previous comments. It seems like you might have missed part of my point.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 21 hours ago

It was for your benefit, not mine. I read it yesterday.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 1 day ago

It seems to be worse to spring forward, is the point. It doesn't align with the most prevalent circadian rhythm in humans, although there are exceptions. I guess those people are just sol regardless, which is regrettable.