this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
649 points (97.2% liked)

Mildly Interesting

25608 readers
713 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I hope everyone who wants to be on permanent DST experiences an eternity of the first day of spring forward, never rested again

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Lol no sun is an extreme.

Yeah at this point you're just in denial about how the vast, vast, vast, vast, vast, vast to the 10 power live. This is just like the extremes thing, you seem to want to take the idea that since extremes exist, in this case that some people have different schedules, then everything for everyone everywhere goes out the window and everything everywhere is arbitrary and made up and doesn't matter.

Shifting the arbitrary number

Again, we are not shifting a number. Daylight savings effectively means we have to wake up an hour earlier because yes we've arranged our society for 8 am.

Honestly I'm gonna peace out. The longer this goes the clearer it's a case of Dunning Kruger.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

An hour earlier and the daylight they receive is different all over the planet depending on the time of the year.

You really should stop and think about what I am trying to tell you. This is not too difficult to understand. Think about time zones even, the people on the boarder at some places have very different times the sun is up. Look at a daylight map of the latitude and year times.

But most importantly: I went and looked at the paper and the intent: Their argument is that we should quit changing. They just picked one. It could be the other one, it makes no difference, they just want it to stop changing. As any rational human should.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Ok I said I was going to peace out, but unfortunately I have to return.

But most importantly: I went and looked at the paper and the intent: Their argument is that we should quit changing. They just picked one. It could be the other one, it makes no difference, they just want it to stop changing. As any rational human should.

From the article:

move permanently to standard time.

Standard time.

sleep experts say that standard time (which shifts daylight hours earlier in the morning) aligns best with human circadian biology.

Standard time.

But research shows permanent daylight saving time overlooks potential health risks that can be avoided by establishing permanent standard time instead,”

Standard time.

That means you are illiterate.

Please consider this in the future before tellling everyone they are wrong. Peace.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

So you read nothing I wrote. You also read an article. I went and read papers and the publication. Which by the way is more of a report and a summary than a peer reviewed study.

The thrust of the publications is: quit changing the time.

The time they landed on (again I think they are morons for the reasons I explained) is they think it is likely to benefit more people, but not everyone. When taking into account all other factors, including time zones, yearly changes of the earth, latitudes, there is no one size fits all, it just MAY fit slightly better.

Yeah, you probably should just quit talking to me, because it seems no matter how much evidence I provide, you are just going to fall back to arguing about it.