this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
409 points (98.1% liked)

News

36457 readers
3610 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A couple of 20-year-old developers make $500,000 a month promising to help men to stop watching porn, but exposed their private porn watching habits.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Leather@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Porn / sex "addiction" does not exist. Some nice folks who were super invested in proving it gave up a while back.

Most people have perfectly average porn / sex use, and are shamed by a partner or cultural messages.

A small percentage of people deal with "OCSB", out of control sexual behavior.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I disagree, but that's fine. There are people that squeeze porn into every open minute of their lives, sacrifice relationship is because of it, and spend more than they have to view it. If that's not addiction, then we might as well say that any non-chemical vice can't be considered one, like gambling.

[–] super_user_do@feddit.it -4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Just because many people don't seem to notice their addiction that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The methodology used to disprove the existence of porn addiction is just to completely and utterly ignore all the people who experience it and than claiming it doesn't exist

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

I haven't read any such study myself, but it sounds like a BS study. Anything that controls a person's life can be considered an addiction. There are certainly people where porn has controlled their lives. One person who's been very vocal and brutally candid about how it was ruining his life is The Primeagen, a coder on YT. My best friend's father died in huge debts because he was buying copious amounts of porn outside of his means, and phone sex lines. That's addiction.