this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
743 points (94.1% liked)

Games

47109 readers
2580 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Dremor@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
Dremor@jlai.lu
PerfectDark@lemmy.world
743
Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash (www.gamingonlinux.com)
submitted 2 days ago by tonytins@pawb.social to c/games@lemmy.world
419 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A user asked on the official Lutris GitHub two weeks ago "is lutris slop now" and noted an increasing amount of "LLM generated commits". To which the Lutris creator replied:

It's only slop if you don't know what you're doing and/or are using low quality tools. But I have over 30 years of programming experience and use the best tool currently available. It was tremendously helpful in helping me catch up with everything I wasn't able to do last year because of health issues / depression.

There are massive issues with AI tech, but those are caused by our current capitalist culture, not the tools themselves. In many ways, it couldn't have been implemented in a worse way but it was AI that bought all the RAM, it was OpenAI. It was not AI that stole copyrighted content, it was Facebook. It wasn't AI that laid off thousands of employees, it's deluded executives who don't understand that this tool is an augmentation, not a replacement for humans.

I'm not a big fan of having to pay a monthly sub to Anthropic, I don't like depending on cloud services. But a few months ago (and I was pretty much at my lowest back then, barely able to do anything), I realized that this stuff was starting to do a competent job and was very valuable. And at least I'm not paying Google, Facebook, OpenAI or some company that cooperates with the US army.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this "issue" might come up so I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not. Whether or not I use Claude is not going to change society, this requires changes at a deeper level, and we all know that nothing is going to improve with the current US administration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 52 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

I really hate this new trend of FOSS developers being attacked and harassed for using AI. You might not like if they are using AI. Or you might not like AI at all, but there's no reason to harass people who are providing you free software. Let them develop it like they want. If you don't like that they used AI, use another software. Or fork the software before they started using AI. But attacking people like that is not okay on so many levels. It's not okay to attack people for the software they are using. It's not okay to attack developers providing a free service and it's not okay to attack people at all.

[–] ilickfrogs@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago

The only degenerates attacking open source devs wouldn't even have the capacity to vibe code something themselves. Literal losers. If they're so much better than the devs, fork it and make it yourself fucktard.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml -4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not so sure anymore whether THEY are providing FOSS or just approving slop PRs. I do not like harassment at all, even less against a guy that says is/was dealing with depression. That's why I comment here. Being said that, it's kind of a jerk move to just hide the fact he is using this tool for development under his own name. As a teacher, few things would make me more mad than having a student doing this.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I mean does it really matter? people are using his software and it is totally irrelevant how he is developing it. It doesn't matter if he is scribbling it on paper or using VS Code or something else or an AI tool. He can develop the software as he likes. You can walz into an open source project and demand that the project has to work according to your own standards. We are not in school - in school the cheating with AI is hindering your learning progress, but if you want to use a coding agent as adult, just do it. And you don't have to disclose it because why should you? You also don't disclose that you are using code auto-completion or some other technology.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml -5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

That's where we are different. I don't use Lutris, now I'm sure I won't be trying it. Of course there are people who think this is relevant. I didn't think I'd have to explain to you that it is not about them using AI as a tool, it's about not giving enough information about their authorship what concerns me. I suppose they accept donations, well, it is important to me that part of my donations don't end up with companies that hurt the environment and people's jobs. Did auto-completion technologies steal almost all humankind constructed knowledge? Do they need catastrophic amounts of environmental resources to work? Do they produce grave diseases to whole populations near them? Did they disrupt several markets for being created? How many employments did they ruin?

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 6 points 6 hours ago

Does it really matter? You do not know how commercial software is being developed. In most cases you do not even know which language is used and AI usage is also not disclosed. You do not know this about your phone, you do not know about your appliances, you do not know how the software in your car is being made, you do not know how everything you're using every day is being created. I'm not sure why you have other standards for open source software. And please do not tell me that you are only using open source software in your car or in the train you're using as public transit.

And yes, there might be harm, but let's be honest, every other company around there is doing harm to someone or the environment. And if an open source dev uses AI this is really not the fight you want to do. fight against oil companies or something like that. factory farming, the car industry, big tech and all the other industries doing real harm. Attacking the dev of Lutris is not the fight anyone should put some effort in.

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Transparency. The developer lied and then stopped crediting Claude.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

That's twisting the order of events.

The developer was marking code when AI was used.

Anti-AI drones started harassing him in Discord, the forums and Github PRs

The developer stopped marking code when AI was used.

The Anti-AI assholes are not participating in development in good faith, this is a harassment campaign. He's taking steps to mitigate the harassment.

The fault and blame here is entirely on the people who thought it was okay to dog pile on a volunteer developer.

[–] lorthirk@feddit.it 1 points 11 hours ago

Claude must be really upset about this. But other people?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 13 hours ago

Or better yet, try to find why they're using it and help fill those gaps by contributing.