this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
468 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

82829 readers
4256 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 70 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Of course the cops keep using it - payments from the inevitable lawsuits don't come out of their pockets, so why give a shit when there are quotas to make? No accountability breeds irresponsibility.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (3 children)

That would fix it quickly. Wrongful arrest takes funding directly from the agency that did it. 6months in prison, all funds for 6months for that agency. Either everyone will quit or they would shut down completely. Asking the police officers to work for no pay for 6 months would eventually pit them against others making wrongful arrests and make those who don't care about doing whats right quit because they don't care about anything but the paycheck. The only people you might have left are those who actually wanted to help the people.

Or they'd just become more corrupt and kill more people to make sure they had no say... Hard to say

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The second part. I have no faith the American public doing the right thing.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The best method is to require unions to pay for malpractice insurance on cops.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The requirement should be that police carry malpractice insurance. Who pays is secondary, as long as it's not the taxpayer paying directly.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 day ago

The unions footing the bill means they stop protecting the cops when they get too expensive.

[–] Nelots@piefed.zip 3 points 3 days ago

Asking the police officers to work for no pay for 6 months would eventually pit them against others

More likely would eventually cause them all to quit and look for new jobs. I'm no cop sympathizer, but they don't get paid enough to survive 2 months without pay, let alone 6. The people who actually wanted to help others would quit too.