this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
180 points (98.4% liked)
United States | News & Politics
9080 readers
200 users here now
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Hmmmm it's almost like there's a difference between invading and terrorizing another country vs killing one of the richest most immoral people who have blood in their hands
Yeah, thats why I asked. There is a big difference between being empathetic to someone fighting against Americas monolithic and broken Healthcare industry vs killing random people in a war America started.
Killing someone who put profits before humans to the point they doomed thousands to excruciating slow agonizing death is good actually. In the same way that killing fascists is good.
They are many things fascist isn't one of them currently. But if they were to be killed by leftwing/communist revolutionaries I would support it yes (if it was planned out well enough to not aid imperialist forces). Nice gotcha attempt though.
Not to mind it's a ridiculous analogy comparing majorly flawed yet still currently antimperialist leaders to a healthcare CEO (the most predatory kind of private insurance).
I can't tell if you are a bot or just a reddit refugee