this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
1251 points (91.2% liked)

Political Memes

11448 readers
2999 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only if you were going to vote Democrat.

Republicans hate republican voters going 3rd party.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Which is why the Republicans are directly helping the Green Party. Because every vote for the Green Party is one less vote for Democrats. Should give you a hint about who voting third party helps.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

So the title is

Group with GOP ties backs Green Party’s Jill Stein with ads, mail

Seems pretty direct to me, right?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

but they could not work directly with the campaign. Stein had no control over the messaging

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

And what does that difference matter?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 hours ago

they weren't directly helping her

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Because every vote for the Green Party is one less vote for Democrats

that's not true. many people would vote for a green candidate but would never vote for a war party candidat.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Well, enjoy your Iran war, after refusing to vote for Kamela Harris. Harris would not have invaded Iran.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

no, it's impossible to prove a nonfactual

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Do you say that to the people who are saying Harris would have done the same things that Trump is doing, or is that only a response to people saying it’s blatantly fucking obvious that she wouldn’t? Sounds like cope to me.

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

we can't know what would have happened if she had won because she didn't win.

I don't see anyone saying she would have invaded iran, though, so I've never had the opportunity to educate such a person on the unprovableness of nonfactuals

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

We can.

We can know that she wouldn’t have the same administration who have been doing this shit. You can make some logical deductions that if we didn’t have Hegseth and the heritage foundation pulling all the strings with no consequences for their actions that things would, inarguably, not be happening as they are now. We can be sure the Venezuela and Cuba shit wouldn’t be happening. There are plenty of things that we absolutely can guarantee would not be happening, it just requires you to pull your head out of your ass.

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

this does not give us access to an alternate reality in which kamal won. it's just storytelling. there is no evidence for it because there can be no evidence for it.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

It’s not about getting a wish, it’s about establishing accountability for actions and faulty reasoning. Do better next time, if there is one.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Trump apparently took the decision to go to war against Iran ignorant of the Iranian threat to close the Hormuz straight. Even I knew Iran would do that.

The whole reason to go to war with Iran was to stop the Iranian nuclear program... which Trump himself cancelled Obama's deal to stop.

Harris would not have been Bibi's little bitch.

There is no reason to think that Harris would have gone to war with Iran.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 hours ago

this isn't proof. it's story telling