Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Using a decentralised system for concert tickets seems like an expensive way to take a centralised operation (the organiser sells the tickets and can manage resell / third parties) to force a distributed system (that will be less efficient since there is overhead ensuring distributed systems aren't controllable by a single entity)
The benefit is less about decentralization in this case (although it would be nice because fuck corporations, especially Ticketmaster) and more about the use of cryptography. The blockchain and non-fungible aspect allows people to buy tickets secondhand without a doubt in their mind that the tickets are fakes or copies, all without the need for a corpo-approved marketplace which make the rich leeches richer.
You can use cryptography in a centralised system too. The issues with the fakes is more that its not supported / people try to work around the system. Why would a block chain backed system stay that way after they are entrenched? It's layers on top and all those layers are separate layers that are trying to make money... that's where there funding comes from and why they exist. Why would they not go down the same path since owning their layer gives that control. I have friends that were working exactly in that space and I saw nothing that made me think they would be any better besides currently being smaller
It's going to be whatever new technology built on the shoulders of blockchain tech that works for this. Whatever they solve the efficiency problems with. Then it might have a fighting chance at being a currency, being used as provenance, etc.
I think AI's got a similar issue with the agentic side of it. Still needs another big advance.
But... why? The centralised database uses less power so it's a more efficient foundation. There are some situations where distribution might be worth that cost. A lot of those situations that people were excited about early on (a global currency / gold alternative) haven't proven to be robust to the overhead (although speculative investments and transactions you don't want tracked are working for some people)
All that said, how does a concert ticket ever fit into that foundation as a win... without bringing up a liberation type ideology?