Asklemmy

53732 readers

481 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS

How would you respond to the statement "Trans women are biologically male" ? (literature.cafe)

submitted 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) by Karl@literature.cafe to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(I'm just trying to learn. No hidden mockery in this and this is no gotcha bs aimed at t women. I'm NOT transphobic. Just saw this in a debate and wanted to know other people's thoughts)

I just want to know:

Is this factually correct?
If it is, does it matter? Why or why not?
How would you logically respond to this?
How does this statement not contradict with Trans Women are Women

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zangoose@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

DNA isn't perfect either though. It's possible to be AMAB with XX chromosomes and AFAB with XY chromosomes (both still having the "correct" fully functional organs for their assigned gender). Some intersex people can also have multiple sets of DNA, some being XX and some being XY.

Neatly fitting all cases of biology into 2 categories like that is basically impossible anyway regardless of how you do it. "Biologically male/female" is basically impossible to define without also excluding some people that were born into each category. They're fundamentally useless terms that don't actually convey anything meaningful..

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

There's an info graphic somewhere with like 40+ variants and how they manifest