this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
50 points (82.9% liked)
Asklemmy
53762 readers
328 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The reason athletic sports are segregated by gender is because physically, cis men vastly outperform cis women. Like, if we got rid of gender divisions altogether, cis men would be the only ones competing. I think it's unfair to both cis and transgender female athletes to effectively bar them from competitions altogether.
For nonathletic sports, it's more complicated. In chess, for example, the best female chess player in history is the 64th best chess player overall. The second best woman doesn't break the top 140. I assume this is because of historical discrimination against women in the chess community leading to them being underrepresented at the top. Having women's divisions is good because it encourages women to play.
To be clear, trans women are women, so it only makes sense to have them compete against other women.