Zionism is not external to Judaism. I think you're issue stems from thinking that this applies zionist metaphysically, as something intrinsic to ones character, but it's applying it dialetectically as to how jewish people relate to Israel, settlerism, colonialism and other zionists.

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Also, aren't like 90% of Jews worldwide in favour of Israel existing?

[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 12 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Exactly, "Yes all jews" is not to say that "jews are zionists because their noses are shaped like that" but because they are part of a religion where almost(?) every single institution has been co-opted by zionism and there is no movement to push them out. Judaism is an organized religion where almost(?) all the organisation are zionist.

[–] OgdenTO@hexbear.net 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean, she describes it as a character flaw. She literally calls the entirety of Judaism morally bankrupt.

The fact that virtually all Jews and Jewish spaces are Zionist and support the existence of Israel is an indictment of us as a morally bankrupt people.

This is the treatment of the diaspora as all exactly the same that feels antisemitic in the way it's presented. I appreciate the dialectical analysis that the Jewish cultural establishment is doing nothing to reduce its support of Israel. But she goes over the top in parts of the discussion and crosses a line, in my opinion.

[–] Kumikommunism@hexbear.net 1 points 1 hour ago

She literally calls the entirety of Judaism morally bankrupt.

So can you describe to me the Judaism you're talking about that isn't the cause, justification, and driving force of a genocide? Or how genocide isn't morally bankrupt? What exactly are you arguing?