362
submitted 1 year ago by fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tempest@lemmy.ca 87 points 1 year ago

Probably should put some push bars on those ambulances and give them permission to get things out of the way.

Though it should be noted the root cause of the issue is car first infrastructure which likely contributed to the accident to begin with.

[-] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

If ambulances were able and allowed to push other vehicles out of the way, then there would be a chance that Americans would leave a corridor in traffic jams to keep from getting shoved aside.

[-] Astrealix@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago
[-] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Definitely. Now that I think about it, a separate vehicle to do the shoving would save the patient from getting bumped around.

But then, there would need to be more ambulances following along to pick up people who get injured because all the imaginary cars getting shoved out of the way are occupied.

[-] Astrealix@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Fuck 'em. Let them die, and then we have less cars on the roads /j

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

People get out of the way for emergency vehicles where I'm from. I've seen what you're describing in NYC and I don't really like being grouped with them.

[-] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I think the person above is referring to the law in Germany (and maybe other EU countries?) where if traffic slows to a stop on a highway everyone pulls to the side (right lane to the right, left lane to the left) to leave a corridor down the center just in case an emergency vehicle comes. It's called Rettungsgasse.

[-] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago

It's just Mad Max enough to work by God

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

The ambulance apparently chose not to pass on the right in the lanes that were moving because of policy or something like that. I know where I live stopping where you are at is what you are supposed to do, so this one really seem slide it might be misleading anti self driving sensationalism.

It still has a long way to go, but stopping for emergency vehicles really sounds like it was working as designed to follow the laws.

[-] Kelsenellenelvial@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Be interesting to see exactly what the traffic patterns looked like. There’s the set of driving regulations that generally say we should make way for emergency vehicles, but not if it requires ignoring another regulation. For example, if you’re stopped at a red light and an emergency vehicle approaches from behind, law says you wait for the light to turn green, then proceed when safe. Real drivers will run that light, hop a curb, make an illegal u-turn, etc. to make space, and nobodies going to get ticket for that, but it they are technically still violations.

I also think the comparison shouldn’t necessarily be against a typical driver, but a novice one, who doesn’t always respond correctly to an uncommon situation.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I noted that too. Sounds like corporate bullshit.

"Well, another lanes was moving so it could have gone around, also, if the patient had just taken an med flight helicopter this wouldn't have happened."

Like so what another lane is moving. Would the ambo have to back up and do a K turn to get around the glitched car?

[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

This topic has come up at work several times. What's funny is each time it does everyone gets excited about the possibility of it happening to them on a critical call.

Our ambulances are built on 4x4 capable F-350 chassis and we're all union firefighters/medics. It feels like the 21st century version of "car blocking a hydrant".

this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
362 points (91.7% liked)

News

23659 readers
3151 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS