News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
I'm going to punch some holes in that... the fact check is making the assumption that Negri was still working as a conductor. That's not what Biden said. He said he was a "senior guy at [possibly should've been or in the way some folks speak, on] Amtrack."
Not concerned about whether he recalls it as 2012-2013 or "in this one case" 2015.
Not concerned that his mother would've already been dead, the story about how he was riding to see her under my interpretation is not related to the event with Ang.
I'm generally all for AP but this is a mess. It also ignores the calculation being slightly wrong/made with different assumptions by the train drivers/Joe misremembering or misstating the exact calculation.
This is an exceptionally weak fact check that seems to interpret what Biden was saying in a very specific way and then asserts there's no way that specific interpretation happened... rather than questioning the interpretation and elements of the situation.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/04/30/remarks-by-president-biden-at-an-event-marking-amtraks-50th-anniversary/
This would've been after already getting beaten up over inaccuracies.
Jesus fucking Christ, this is the hill you are dying on? This is such a nothing burger of a confabulated story. He's telling a story for the moral of it, not for the exact accuracy of a court testimony. He took the train a lot. He knew one specific conductor. Whether he knew the conductor while he was taking the train to see his mom is immaterial to the point of the story.
This is beige suit level of idiocy.
Point is he can't get basic retelling of a situation correct, even with a staff and after his versions getting debunked he "swear to God, true story" his claims. You clearly don't care, which is fine, you're free to move along..
I think he probably just didn't care. As the other guy said, the exact details of the story weren't his priority. I'm 28, even I as a younger man have variations in my stories when I tell them, especially off the cuff...
and Biden has a reputation for going off script. See the old "scandal" where he as VP tells Obama "this is a big fucking deal" as the mic accidentally catches him.
This seems like one of those "off script" moments. I mean do you really think he couldn't get this story down with precision if he cared? And if he or his writers are so worried about it, do you really think they'd leave it in the script over and over again?
He's old, I'll give you that, but come on. The machine that wants to paint this guy as incompetent is relentless.
He's fine, a half hour with no script in hand, no prompter, etc last Monday https://youtu.be/ybC9TfYRxP8