190
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 72 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If history starts getting deleted from wikipedia because it's inconvenient to liberals THAT is the quickest way to kill wikipedia as a reliable and "unbiased" source in the eyes of everyone.

I could not have come up with a better way to kill wiki than they have come up with themselves.

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago

I think you’re drastically overestimating the critical thinking faculties of westerners.

[-] RollaD20@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago

If you haven't read this article, I highly recommend. Wikipedia has severe issues regarding reliability.

https://www.wired.com/story/one-womans-mission-to-rewrite-nazi-history-wikipedia/

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

"in the eyes of everyone" was the operative phrase. Awoo definitely knows some NATOpedia lore, like most people on this site do.

[-] RollaD20@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

yeah i assumed she likely knew about it. I probably could've phrased it better. I comment as much for the lurkers as for the people I'm responding to.

[-] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

History is already frequently deleted from Wikipedia because it's inconvenient to liberals.

this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
190 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13498 readers
1091 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS