39
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
39 points (97.6% liked)
chat
8133 readers
339 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
of course, yes, this would just be rhetoric in isolation, to start turning us away from decades-long policies to the contrary; saying so obviously wouldn't make it so, and of course it would never happen for precisely the reasons you described, but I think to say an international superpower can't take a sharp left turn kind of flies in the face of history. obviously, just look at what the Bolsheviks accomplished. Stalin didn't particularly care what the bourgeois class interests were, they were powerless to stop him because he had the military and the proletariat behind him, and theoretically nothing stops Biden from having some kind of aneurism that makes him abandon neoliberal statecraft in favor of anti-imperial legislation. yes, the institutions and his own underwriters would be doing literally everything they could to stop him, but he's still in a position imbued with enormous authority. it isn't impossible.
it just would never happen
Because him and the Red Army took over the entire country by force from the Royals and Kings
Biden is not, and can never be Stalin. Biden and all US presidents elected under a liberal democracy has been and will forever be the King with the rest of the government and capitalists being Royals
this whole thread is a good example of people deliberately missing the point of the post to do some mastabutory ideology, which is fine, but kind of annoying
You're in great man territory there, comrade. The US isn't a neoliberal hellscape because no sufficiently visionary leader has stepped forward to change that, its because the material conditions there make neoliberal hellscapery unavoidable. Things are steadily worsening and that could lead to a growing class consciousness but the empire would have to sufficiently weaken enough that the treats cut off before that would happen.
If Biden did what you suggest he would have an unfortunate stroke that night and Kamala would give a saddened speech about his sudden cognitive decline before getting destroyed in the next election and things would go back to business as usual.
Stalin was able to ignore the bourgeoisie because he had the people behind him. The people didn't support him because he gave great speeches, he just voiced the feelings they already had
your counter critique is just end of history shit, but yes, everyone seems to be reading way too much into this throwaway post
Your statement reads like idealism. People, myself included, are countering with dialectical materialism because we're Marxist. I'm not sure what you expected
countering with "you should do a dialectical materialism" because you're in a terminally online leftist space that can't distinguish a call to action or political prediction from a throwaway comment that is idealistic by its nature is what i'm bemoaning; it's erroneous, annoying, masterbatory, and a symptom of everyone feeling like they can't be allowed to look like a lib. anyway, thank you for explaining hexbear is marxist and that i did not do a dialectical materialism, that wasn't really the point of the post and that's the last either of us probably needs to say about it