125

I'd love to see those Hexbears have an answer for this!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dr_Gabriel_Aby@hexbear.net 71 points 1 year ago

I can understand getting fooled and believing all the bad stuff about Mao and Stalin, but I genuinely don’t understand how libs treat Lenin like a great evil. They can’t even give Lenin the “his revolution got out of hand when he died” point. I really don’t see what Lenin did that was extreme. The provisional government was about to be overthrown by reactionaries and they already attempted so before the October Revolution. He took power by popular support and most of his factions enemies were foreign to Russian soil.

[-] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 49 points 1 year ago

I really don’t see what Lenin did that was extreme

According to the historical documentary film Anastasia (2020), he personally owned

[-] Huldra@hexbear.net 52 points 1 year ago

Remember that netflix docu series about the tsar family where they intercut a recreation of their execution with a historian calling it(paraphrased) the most hideous and bestial crime of the 20th century?

[-] ProletarianDictator@hexbear.net 40 points 1 year ago

Anti-communists can't help but reveal themselves as Nazis example #320,455,980,656

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

My favorite shot (aside from the one that killed bloody Nicky)

Something doesn’t belong here, I wonder what it could be?

[-] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

wow I didn't know lenin was dead before 1905

[-] oregoncom@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

The only thing they did wrong was not executing the romanovs in public.

[-] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

I wanted it on video smh

[-] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, to paraphrase Molotov, Lenin was even more harsh than Stalin, particularly to his allies. During the height of the revolution and civil war, if he got a letter from a peasant claiming communist party corruption or malfeasance in an area, he would deputize a university professor and some students to go check it out, and if evidence was found of that corruption or malfeasance to their satisfaction (which had no real legal precedent) they had the discretion to either eject them from the party or, depending on the severity of the offense, just straight up execute them, no trial. Which happened fairly regularly. It was not a case of "We have investigated ourselves and found no wrong doing."

Even if you think the evidence standards were lax in the USSR during Stalin's time (which imo they were basically the same as pretty much everyone else's at the time, they were just far more aggressive at pursuing legal actions against high level party members and generals) at the helm, he still always had trials before executing people, even going as far as trying people in absentia, something that Lenin would have considered a ridiculous liberal facade.

Don't get me wrong, these were harsh people, but in comparison to the consequences that would face them and the millions peasants they led if they failed, I don't think they were unnecessarily harsh.

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago

Even if you think the evidence standards were lax in the USSR during Stalin's time (which imo they were basically the same as pretty much everyone else's at the time

Yeah people who complain about this don't compare 1930s Soviet courtrooms to 1930s U.S. courtrooms (because that would be whataboitism, not, you know, having perspective). Think of all the people who had confessions beat out of them or got railroaded on the flimsiest of evidence. Think of all the black people who never made it to the courtroom at all.

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

You don’t understand, the real tragedy is that powerful people had to face consequences for their actions. USSR bad because everyone was executed, but also USSR bad because the elite (lol) was never punished ever

[-] panopticon@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Another one I've seen is blaming Lenin for the Russian Civil War and thus hanging all the war deaths on him as well as the deaths from the subsequent famine. He did advocate for turning the imperialist war into a revolutionary (edit: civil) war, so it's not completely absurd, but how many would have died if Russia had stayed in WWI? Insert the Mark Twain quote about the two reigns of terror.

this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
125 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15918 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS