606
submitted 11 months ago by spaceghoti@lemmy.one to c/politics@lemmy.world

A court-ordered financial auditor has caught Donald Trump quietly moving $40 million from the Trump Organization into a personal bank account—seemingly so the former president could pay his whopping $29 million tax bill.

Trump isn’t supposed to be moving any money around without alerting Barbara S. Jones, a former federal judge in New York tasked with babysitting the Trump Organization for its relentlessly shady business practices. But on Wednesday, she notified a New York state court about some major bank transfers that were never brought to her attention by the Trumps.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 346 points 11 months ago

Cool cool cool, that’s just great. So there are going to be immediate legal consequences, right???

Fuck I’m so tired of this.

[-] noride@lemm.ee 104 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Oh yes yes, consequences aplenty! They are facing a fine of several thousand dollars here! Justice at long last!!

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 52 points 11 months ago

You forgot the strongly worded reprimand. He'll think twice next time.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 37 points 11 months ago

Susan Collins thinks he has already leaned his lesson.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 63 points 11 months ago

I'm honestly starting to think he was sent to us as some sort of test to see how much bullshit we'll put up with before we revolt, and we're fucking failing.

[-] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 31 points 11 months ago

Makes me think of Vault 11 from Fallout New Vegas where the population has to sacrifice one person every year or everyone would be killed.

Only it was a test and if they refused then nobody is killed. But they send sacrifices for almost 200 years.

[-] AlecSadler@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Did the sacrifices that were sent actually get killed?

[-] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Oh yep, yep they did.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

But on Wednesday, she notified a New York state court

Just how fast you want them to move?! This was reported to the court TODAY.

[-] Yearly1845@reddthat.com 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

And he stole classified documents three years ago. He orchestrated a failed coup three years ago too. At the rate this is going he's going to be elected grand emperor and he will just dismiss the cases against him.

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Probably before with the many laws he’s already broken and been indicted for.

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Wake me up if he’s in a high max security prison with an orange jumpsuit and a tear tattooed next to his eye

[-] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

the legal ramifications for Trump is so great, that it’ll spill over to people who shouldn’t be in trouble but sadly had the letter ‘T’ in their name. So sorry Tommy and Tina, you’re going to jail cause our Orange Idiot is too rich.

Oh, you too Anthony and Bridgette, don’t think we didn’t see those T’s hiding!

[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

This is already done and has been for months. They are just trying to figure out exactly how fucked over here is.

[-] ripcord@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago
[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago

You’re wrong. Anything can happen with the federal cases but this New York one will stick. The law they are using was created specifically for people like Trump that they can’t take down criminally.

[-] ripcord@kbin.social 24 points 11 months ago

I hope you're right but the last 6 years have eliminated 100% of confidence that you will be.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 11 points 11 months ago

Your cynicism is totally understandable, but all the lawyers I've listened to on this one say he's fucked. It's just that Justice moves too slowly for the average person, so it feels like nothing is being done about his lawlessness.

[-] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 11 months ago

Dude he's about to be elected perpetual supreme grand emperor so he can just cancel democracy.

Cross all the t's and dot all the i's but penalise him already.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 6 points 11 months ago

I feel you. Justice moves slowly, especially for people who have immense privilege. I want him behind bars or hidden away somewhere, never to be seen again. We're too close to fascism to be giving people like him the benefit of the doubt.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Hey, he actually paid E Jean Carroll her proceeds from the lawsuit (this was part of the transactions listed here).

So he was actually out a little under $6M from a legal loss, and actually paid.

Anyway, toss that toothpick on the scales opposite the sequoiah of judicial indifference.

[-] Borkingheck@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

What's the issue here exactly?

[-] Pistcow@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

You legally can't treat a corporation as your personal ATM.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
606 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19145 readers
4637 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS