1015
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Ukraine’s security service blew up a railway connection linking Russia to China, in a clandestine strike carried out deep into enemy territory, with pro-Kremlin media reporting that investigators have opened a criminal case into a “terrorist attack.”

The SBU set off several explosions inside the Severomuysky tunnel of the Baikal-Amur highway in Buryatia, located some 6,000 kilometers east of Ukraine, a senior Ukrainian official with direct knowledge of the operation told POLITICO.

“This is the only serious railway connection between the Russian Federation and China. And currently, this route, which Russia uses, including for military supplies, is paralyzed,” the official said.

Four explosive devices went off while a cargo train was moving inside the tunnel. “Now the (Russian) Federal Security Service is working on the spot, the railway workers are unsuccessfully trying to minimize the consequences of the SBU special operation,” the Ukrainian official added.

Ukraine’s security service has not publicly confirmed the attack. Russia has also so far not confirmed the sabotage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago

Can anyone explain how different the languages are? Super different or "they kind of get eachother, just are noticably different"

[-] nolannice@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

They have similar alphabets, grammar and a lot of cognates. If you only spoke one you'd be able to recognize most of a sentence with these things, but sometimes words are totally different. They probably sound similar to someone unfamiliar with both, but they are quite distinct.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 7 points 1 year ago

So like Spanish and Italian or closer?

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

It appears, lexically they are closer than Spanish and Italian, close to like Italian and Romanian, but a bit further. There are many ways to measure language distance though, so this is just a vague analogy

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I thought they were mutually intelligible?

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Actually they are not. It's just that knowing a bit of the other language is too common to understand that for many people. Also very often for person asked some kind of surzhik (a mix) is imagined instead of one of these languages.

That's a bit like how English speakers often imagine Scots - just English with weird accent. It's obviously not that.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

Russian has too much Church Slavic influence, Ukrainian has a bit more Polish, German etc influence, and also the Church Slavic influence there is a bit different (say, the loanwords were adapted for East Slavic phonetics mostly).

In Russian the prestigious language was Church Slavic, in Ukrainian - a written East Slavic language, so Ukrainian is a bit more consistent.

If we hypothetically remove that, I'm not sure they'd be considered different languages (despite there being dialectal differences even in XII century).

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

Similar enough for mutual intelligibility but different enough that Russian only speakers will probably run into a shiboleth

[-] electrogamerman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Like Spanish from Mexico and Spanish from Spain?

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

No need for people to even speak different languages to run into shibboleth, the pronunciation of Russian is very different in different regions, the Ukrainian is not homogeneous either.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Somebody once said to me that it's rather like the difference between English and Dutch.

If you ever hear Dutch it rather sounds like English and you've just not quite heard them correctly. If you were in another room and just heard the ebb and flow of the language you'd probably not be able to tell the difference, but in person directly you can.

And as a non-speaker of both languages they sound basically the same to me so I think it is true

[-] Kraivo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I'd say, Ukrainian have more brutal (deep throat) sounding than russian, but maybe it's only local thing with Ukrainian guys i was talking with. So, usually it's like 14 years old kid in Ukraine sounds like grown up Russian dude

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

That may be about pronunciation of a few sounds, anybody from the southwest of Russia sounds the same.

Also intonation in Ukrainian can on the contrary feel more gentle\polite.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

There is a lexical tree that gives some insight. Lexicostatistical distance would have worked better, I think, but I cant seem to find the numbers for that kind of metric.

Here I've edited an excerpt from the table, that shows how far Russian and Ukrainian are and how that compares to some other European languages

lexic distance comparison between some European languages

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

I don't have data, but feels wrong. Maybe if this is about historical, genetic distance, then yes, Belarusian is quite a lot closer to Russian.

But in reality Ukrainian and Belarusian have mostly the same West Russian lexicon, while Russian is different (say, more South Slavic, as in Church Slavic, loanwords), for historical reasons (in GDL West Russian written language was used for administration in its East Slavic parts ; in Muscovy Church Slavic was prestigious, so the official language was heavily influenced by that).

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

You can as well download the PDF and read the description, the thing is not based on historical reasons, it analyses a selected part of each language core using algorithm that is used to analyse DNA distance, as far as I understand.

To address what you've said, it sais:

Four factors influence lexical similarity registered in the tree: (1) genetic or genealogical relationship of languages, (2) diffusion (language borrowing), (3) universal tendencies for lexical similarity such as onomatopoeia, and (4) random variation (chance).

So the Ukrainian and Belarussian are likely different enough in everything else than the lexicon you've mentioned

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

So the Ukrainian and Belarussian are likely different enough in everything else than the lexicon you’ve mentioned

They are similar in lexicon and grammar, but phonetically very different, almost as if they were in the opposite directions from Russian.

this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
1015 points (98.8% liked)

World News

39358 readers
2387 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS