this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
1467 points (99.3% liked)

News

36375 readers
2723 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] StevenWithaPH@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Now what’s the chance of this actually passing?

[–] cryptosporidium140@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Via referendum? I say 80% chance of a majority.

Congress? 5% is generous

[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Eh maybe, I can see the attack ads now though.

Special interests in Washington want to destroy the value of your home by placing strict regulations on home ownership! Government beurocrat fat cats wants to put themselves in charge of who can and can't buy a home! Don't let the big wigs in Washington destroy your homes value and strangle your children's future and their inheritance! Vote no on proposition 1! This ad paid for by free homes for all real Americans (a Koch industries subsidiary).

Never underestimate peoples ability to vote against their own interest when partisanship get involved.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)

With a divided Congress, the bills are unlikely to pass into law this session. But Mr. Smith said legislators needed to start a conversation.

:|

[–] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

How exactly does Mr. Smith propose a conversation begin with a bunch of seditious asswipes???

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

It's probably not intended for them, it's another issue they want in the media to bring people to the polls next year

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

First he has to go to Washington...

[–] girlfreddy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Dad joke extraordinaire.

Lol

[–] StevenWithaPH@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I wonder which side doesn’t want it to pass /s

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Well, yeah. That's how politics work. Or should.

Get the issue in front of the people, get them talking. Like we are now. Give one side a chance to say, "See what we tried and got shot down!" You gotta start somewhere.

This is the first I've heard of such an initiative and I'm all in.

[–] interceder270@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Fun fact: there is always a divided congress because the ruling class just adjusts its spending on elections to ensure nothing ever gets done in our favor.

As soon as we start voting more/for better candidates, they start spending more. They haven't even scratched the surface of how much they can spend to control the government; they don't need to yet.

As the disparity in wealth continues to grow, they'll just have even more money to ensure their grip for generations.