54
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/outoftheloop@lemmy.world

A couple months ago the findings against Hunter Biden were nothing, not even worth taking to court, only under GOP pressure did the Trump appointed prosecutor take it to court. Now it seems like a big deal and 17 years (max). What happened? Why the change? Was new evidence found?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Jaccident@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Accruing back taxes can happen for a lot of reasons, one of which would be deliberate under reporting, which if a form of fraud. Hence why the IRS has the latitude to recommend charges if they feel the actions were significant and deliberate.

It’s important to remember that Trump’s current case he’s arguing he didn’t have the Mens Rea for deliberate fraud, so it’s weird to see GOP members discounting that argument as invalid with Biden.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

It's unconscionable certainly, but "weird" implies unusual or unexpected.

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
54 points (81.4% liked)

Out of the loop

11105 readers
1 users here now

A community that helps people stay up to date with things going on.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS