this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
278 points (95.4% liked)

World News

43874 readers
3419 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This iconic mouse is weeks away fromn being in the public domain Jan. 1, 2024, is the day when 'Steamboat Willie' enters the public domain

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If Disney doesn't keep illegally extending the copyright dates, continuing to ruin the way copyrights are supposed to actually work, I will legitimately be surprised.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not illegal if you change the laws... 🙃

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But if you change the laws via illegal means...

[–] galloog1@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure that Congress passing legislation concerning interstate trade is expressly permitted in the Constitution. You could make an argument for ethics, practicality, or economics. I don't think you can make a legality argument here.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

illegally

The problem is that they're doing it legally.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I refuse to believe they are not bribing judges and lawmakers. Its not possible that Disney is doing this without doing anything illegal.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

They might be doing that... but not possible? Come on dude. That's just a failure of imagination. There are plenty of legal ways to corrupt the government. Lobbying is the most common one, and very legal. Insisting that they're committing crimes without any evidence of it is just silly.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] calavera@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Even if they wanted, there is not much time left to change anything at this point

[–] jmd_akbar@aussie.zone 20 points 1 year ago

Not with that attitude...

[̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅]

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

need to revert it back to 20 years with one extension allowed.

[–] dezmd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I actually like the 20year with extension. That gives authors 40 effing years to make money on it. If you could not in that time then boo hoo.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mickey Mouse is no longer as relevant in Disney’s dominance anymore. They got bigger cash cows to milk.

[–] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but it is still the icon and mascot of disney.

[–] art@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why it's trademarked. Unlike a copyright, trademarks can last forever.

[–] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But from what I'm understanding third parties will be able to use it at will to some extent, right? Disney must have an interest in keeping something so representative under tight control, even if it's just the first version.

[–] art@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can use the character without infringing the trademark. Part of the reason they scatter the hidden Mickey shape everywhere is because that's part of the branding.

A good example of using the character without infringing trademark is the "Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey" movie.

Thanks, it seems I had quite the wrong idea, I'll have to read up on the topic.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

Even less so for the version in Steamboat Willy, which is all that would be released. Modern Mickey is not being released anytime soon.