this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
21 points (100.0% liked)
196
18122 readers
485 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There's definitely some works that have unnecessary sex scenes; it's more obvious in movies, though. A lot of the time, the entire romance subplot is utterly unnecessary, and sometimes horribly executed on top of that. Remember The Hobbit, now imagine they also had a sex scene!
Well, if a scene is just unnecessary and out of place, that's bad, but I mean, kind of every unnecessary scene(?) is. Idk, I just know many instances of sex scenes that I'd consider rather important for the plot (e.g. in Black Mirror), and just erasing them would make the art worse.
In at least a few cases, the "unnecessary" sex scene is necessary to get the film the rating that the director feels is appropriate for the film, because violence and adult themes don't always get the rating they probably should and the MPAA is a bunch of prudes about sex.
Damn, that's fucked up.