689
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

New York’s governor vetoed a bill days before Christmas that would have banned noncompete agreements, which restrict workers’ ability to leave their job for a role with a rival business.

Gov. Kathy Hochul, who said she tried to work with the Legislature on a “reasonable compromise” this year, called the bill “a one-size-fits-all-approach” for New York companies legitimately trying to retain top talent.

“I continue to recognize the urgent need to restrict non-compete agreements for middle-class and low-wage workers, and am open to future legislation that achieves the right balance,” she wrote in a veto letter released Saturday.

The veto is a blow to labor groups, who have long argued that the agreements hurt workers and stifle economic growth. The Federal Trade Commission had also sent a letter to Hochul in November, urging her to sign the bill and saying that the agreements can harm innovation and prevent new businesses from forming in the state.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ersatz@infosec.pub 208 points 7 months ago

For example, the sandwich chain Jimmy John’s previously came under scrutiny for forcing its low-wage workers to sign noncompete agreements that prevented them from working for a nearby business for two years after they left.

Jesus, they basically want slavery. They want workers to be completely dependent on them to the point that you legally can't go work at a different sandwich shop. I've only eaten there once and it was mediocre, but I'll never step foot in there again. What the fuck.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 100 points 7 months ago

Why the fuck do they even need a non-compete clause for a sandwich shop? Are they worried people are going to reveal their secret Jimmy Johns technique for putting salami on bread to Subway?

[-] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 47 points 7 months ago

The myth of the non-skilled worker isn't working in their favor here.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 32 points 7 months ago

It's legal for them to do so, and if employees can't go to a competitor, it has the effect of depressing wages.

Non-compete clauses make sense for certain higher level employees (and usually involve some sort of garden leave payment too) but corporate America has started to slip all sorts of bullshit into standard employment contracts just because they can.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

I don't even think it makes sense for them anymore. You either retain them with pay and job satisfaction or not. This idea that corporations can own experience is bullshit.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Kinda like the whole Disney artist thing.

Any character you create while working for Disney is Disney property. Even if it was a quick sketch done on a napkin. Even if the character doesn't even have a name.

[-] dept 2 points 7 months ago

wait is that on company time or just in general?

[-] Kerensky1101@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

In general. Even art the artist makes at home in their own free time belongs to Disney

[-] TipRing@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

It's not just to depress wages, preventing worker mobility also lets you abuse them in other ways like rotating schedules (which also prevent workers from holding multiple jobs or going to school), bad work environments and wage theft.

It's not surprising that companies are increasingly abusing the workforce, it's surprising that workers haven't started organizing to fight back.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 10 points 7 months ago

I mean you joke, but that actually happened by me lol

There is a hero shop that is well known for specific heros they make that are really good, so after they fired a guy who worked there for years and years he opened his own shop and took all their recipes plus added pizza. (He also hired someone to make pizza and then fired him after he learned how to do it. He's just a scumbag lol)

[-] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago

Did you mean gyro🥙?

[-] variaatio@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 months ago

It isn't about need, but about want. Every extra notch of control they can get over workers employment opportunities, they want.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

Fun fact, there are franchise owners for all the big names that do this. McDonald's, Pizza Hut, etc. It's not usually a corporate decision.

Related, there are chains that won't hire from each other. They maintain a gray list of previous employees and you can only get hired back at your original location.

[-] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

McDonald's et al corporate level don't care if franchisees do this? I mean, I can see them not caring...but I could also see them trying to score social points by pretending to care and claiming they disallow it.

[-] derf82@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Ah yes, workers might take those precious trade secrets of (checks notes) how to make a sandwich.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Not slavery, serfdom.

Which is technically better then slavery for the serfs, but conveniently is also significantly cheaper for the landed gentry/capital class as they don't have to feed or house their serfs.

[-] TheHotze@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I thought it was a federal law, but it might just be in my state, but I thought for a non-compete to be valid, the employee has to be compensated for it?

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

I don't know of any circumstance where you would be specifically compensated for a non-compete, but in my state they aren't valid unless you make a certain base compensation, which is currently about $125k/year.

this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
689 points (99.3% liked)

News

22488 readers
4051 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS