392
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Unfounded claims about offshore wind threatening whales have surfaced as a flashpoint in the fight over the future of renewable energy.

In recent months, conservatives including former President Donald Trump have claimed construction of offshore wind turbines is killing the giant animals.

Scientists say there is no credible evidence linking offshore wind farms to whale deaths. But that hasn’t stopped conservative groups and ad hoc “not in my back yard”-style anti-development groups from making the connection.

The Associated Press sorts fact from fiction when it comes to whales and wind power as the rare North Atlantic right whale’s migration season gets underway.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

they don't segregate the money. it's fungible and all goes in the same pool. no one is responsible for the decisions they make except the people making the decisions.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

This is nonsense, and I think you know it. If you buy a chicken from the store, they will take your few dollars that you spent and spend it on another chicken to replace the one you bought. They may not keep track of which dollar bills were spent on chickens and only use those dollar bills to buy more, but that's a meaningless distinction. You bought a chicken, and gave the company some number of dollars and now the company is going to spend some number of dollars more on chickens than it otherwise would have. You have paid the company to pay a farm to kill another chicken. You have, via the transitive property, paid for a farm to kill another chicken.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

You have paid the company to pay a farm to kill another chicken.

no. i paid for the food they had at that moment. there is no other transaction for which i am responsible.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

You bought a chicken, and gave the company some number of dollars and now the company is going to spend some number of dollars more on chickens than it otherwise would have.

than it otherwise would have.

this is a counterfactual. it cannot be proven

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

You have, via the transitive property, paid for a farm to kill another chicken.

there is no transitive property, unless you think the people running the store and the farm have no free will. i don't make their decisions for them.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

I know it's you, commie, you're the only one who replies like this. Did you get banned or something, and had to switch to an alt account?

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

you’re the only one who replies like this

cogently, on-topic, and without personal attacks?

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Making an individual reply to every sentence in the parent comment, having the effect of spamming the thread with dozens and dozens of replies and chains that make it hard to keep track of what we're actually arguing about.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

i found meandering, multifaceted comments muddy the waters. I think the shorter comments keep it much clearer.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

If you buy a chicken from the store, they will take your few dollars that you spent and spend it on another chicken to replace the one you bought.

assuming they are open long enough to place another order, and that they don't decide to change their inventory levels and become vegan. frankly, i'm not responsible for what they decide in the future. they could take the money and close shop. it's entirely up to them.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

If you keep buying chickens, they will not decide to become vegan. It is entirely up to them, just like it's entirely up to my friend whether he buys me a burrito from taco bell after I cashapp him $5 for a burrito from taco bell. Worth noting, even though I only transfered $5 from my cashapp to his, and he spent $5 in paper money, I have still facilitated the transfer of $5 into taco bell's bank account

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

this is totally disanalogous: no such contract exists between me and the store that has sold me something. I already have the product and they already have the money. if they close shop and run away with the money, that is just as valid as continuing to act as a retailer.

this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
392 points (98.8% liked)

News

23305 readers
5038 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS