140
it's so over (hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] axont@hexbear.net 50 points 7 months ago

That's not true, it's happened before. The 1876 election for instance was highly contentious and I believe the first time a candidate won the popular vote without winning (Samuel J. Tilden from the Democrats). The election was disputed over a number of things regarding voter fraud, including accusations of disenfranchising black voters. Rutherford B. Hayes ended up winning through a compromise with the electoral commission, in what's called the Compromise of 1877.

Basically, democrats agreed to cede victory to the republicans if union troops were pulled out of the south and reconstruction ended. This was honestly a very shitty idea because it directly led to Jim Crow laws and the structure of segregation that would last until the 1960s.

Hayes was popularly regarded as a fake president in the south, only given the presidency through backroom deals instead of appointment by the consent of voters. The newspapers called him "Rutherfraud B. Hayes" which is honestly a pretty good dunk on his name

[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 22 points 7 months ago

Basically, democrats agreed to cede victory to the republicans

Tale as old as time

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 5 points 7 months ago

Better than Ron DeSanctimonious, at least

this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
140 points (100.0% liked)

electoralism

21949 readers
150 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS