787
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has endorsed President Joe Biden’s reelection campaign, a sign of the president’s strength in uniting his party to have the backing of one of its most liberal members

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Scooter411@lemmy.ml 73 points 1 year ago

Well that’s unfortunate. Wish we could find someone other than an old fucking white guy to represent us.

[-] bookworm@feddit.nl 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The fact that someone like Biden and Bernie exist in the same party tells you how awful the 2-party system is.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 11 points 1 year ago

Bernie has said some really nice things about the Biden Administration.

[-] Scooter411@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 year ago

Too be fair - the Biden administration isn’t all bad and I think when they do something good we should acknowledge that so that maybe they keep doing good things. That doesn’t mean I don’t think there are better options, though.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 15 points 1 year ago

You can hope for better options, but it says something that the Progressive leadership doesn't see a reason to challenge Biden in the primaries. And as some didn't like hearing, the Progressive leadership has found Biden to be an ally in passing significant legislation. The problem of moving forward isn't the Presidency, but Congress.

[-] jdsquared@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

I wish more people understood that. Biden might be centrist, but every single progressive policy that has come his way he has endorsed. He would go even farther to the left if we had the right Congress.

[-] Scooter411@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I agree with all that - but the presidential candidates do a lot of heavy lifting in congressional elections. They can help drive voters to the polls and get more progressive candidates the attention they deserve. Biden isn’t getting anyone excited to go vote.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it says something. It says they'll be blackballed by the party if they dared to challenge the incumbent.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, it's not that hard to. Even simply coherent sentences are like ambrosia after the previous administration, and Joe's got actual things to say on top of that.

[-] Beardliest@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

For real. Even as a white guy, I’m tired of this shit as well. Wish we could get someone younger and more progressive on the ballot. It’s time to get those old ducks out of office. They have no grasp on how shit really works these days.

[-] GiddyGap@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I'm hoping for Newsom 2028. In the meantime, Biden will probably be infinitely better than the alternative in the general election.

[-] guyman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

What specifically do you like about Newsom?

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I like how Newsom fought to deregulate zoning in California, and I think we need such deregulation nationwide.

Single-family zoning is a blight on this country.

[-] vestigial@vlemmy.net 1 points 1 year ago

He's got a great smile.

[-] c0c0c0@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago
[-] candyman337@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree, but generally a party will back a sitting president of that party, additionally division of the Democratic party is what caused trump's election in the first place.

I wonder if she's being groomed to be the next candidate. I would like that a lot, but what the Democratic needs right now is unity, because the Republican party is very divided.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 10 points 1 year ago

She's probably being groomed for House leadership. She has a relatively safe seat and seems willing to put the work in being a good representative. However, to do that, she needs to build the caucuses that she is in.

[-] Zaktor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If the Democratic party needs unity when the Republicans are divided, when exactly would dissent ever be acceptable? Seems like this is just a pitch to always be unified, which in turn means never challenging the party establishment.

[-] candyman337@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The system has been formed that way intentionally. That's one of the huge issues with our election system actually

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

There are many that believe Biden won't run and the seat is being saved for Gavin Newsom.

[-] Scooter411@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

We’ll see if Biden drops out, but he is currently running.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

February 2024 I expect Biden to name a successor. He would be viewed as a lame duck if he didn't pretend to be running right now.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Time will tell, but Newsom would still beat Trump.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

In a cage march, sure

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
787 points (95.1% liked)

politics

18586 readers
4927 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS