278

Denver police have arrested a 13-year-old boy accused of fatally shooting a man whose leg was blocking the aisle on a public bus.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HarriPotero@lemmy.world 147 points 10 months ago

Why does a 13-year-old have access to guns?

[-] maness300@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago
[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 143 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's not just parenting. There are crap parents worldwide, yet this only regularly happens in one place.

E: downvote all you want. Remove my comment if you want. You know it to be true. This is a US thing. Stop worshiping your guns.

And if you are to have them, keep them in a safe, inaccessible to children, when not in use. The fact that this is a controversial statement to Americans is insane.

You can't just handwave away gun problems as "oh it's the parent's fault, nothing can be done"

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

I talk about how much America loves guns and it's military and I get downvoted all the time. And I say that as a left-leaning armed American.

Sorry that facts hurt people's feelings. We literally had school shootings involving kindergartners a decade ago and nothing has changed. Nothing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (46 replies)
[-] Godric@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I had my own gun and access to guns as a 13 year old. Hunting, target practice, etc. It's not an insane age to have firearms.

That said, I was raised to respect the fuck out of the danger inherent in a gun, and I used mine to kill deer for food, not kill people I had a mild disagreement with.

Edit: Well fuck me for being born into a different environment ig. Mass downvoting someone for offering a different perspective is healthy for an online community /s

[-] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 10 months ago

I got beat regularly, and my stepfather at the time used to do stuff like make me wait in the basement for 30 mins, then he'd slowly walk down the stairs with his belt unbuckled so we could hear the jingling in each step, then he'd tell us some scriptures and say this hurt him more than us.

Then if you cried right away it was faking, but if you held on too long it was you being rebellious and stubborn, so my brother and I learned to start faking our cries after the 6th or 7th hit.

I told that to friends as an adult as what I thought was a kinda funny story, and they properly realized I was abused in a somewhat sadistic way and pointed it out to me.

They weren't calling me out for having a different environment, they were correcting my incorrect belief that it was normal or acceptable.

People are doing the same for you. You made it out safely, but giving unstable teens access to guns is definitely a risk that probably shouldn't be taken. Survivor bias isn't an excuse to say it's fine.

[-] zip@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 10 months ago

Hahaha we sound very similar. I've definitely told stories like that to my close friends thinking they're funny and they're horrified.

The sight or sound of someone, especially a man, taking off their belt still triggers the ol' CPTSD decades later lmao.

Anyway, that was a great example. I grew up in a similar place with similar gun culture as them, and had to figure out for myself what you mentioned in your comment. I definitely think a bit of that is at play here.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Well fuck me for being born into a different environment ig. Mass downvoting

Are you sure that is the reason? Maybe it could be that posting that 13 is a good age for gun ownership in a thread about a 13 year old who used it wildly inappropriately? You are entitled to think what you want, I just personally find it a little distasteful everytime there is a gun death to make justifications about the system that allowed it to happen. I imagine others agree.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] deft@lemmy.wtf 9 points 10 months ago

absolutely insane age to have access to a gun unsupervised lmfao

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 7 points 10 months ago

Gotta love being down voted because "America bad" mixed with "guns bad"

Lemmy sure is a weird mixture of people wanting to arm themselves (or allow others to arm) against an increasingly fascist state while some want all guns to be gone forever and think voting and talking is the only way to enact change. These types are also usually the ones who complain about peaceful protestors being mildly inconvenient to others, and shrug their shoulders when the people they watched beat another person nearly to death get a slap on the wrists because "that's justice for you, whaddaya gonna do"

And it really depends on which group gets to the comments first as to how the votes and conversations go.

A properly run society with good living conditions, social programs, medical/psychological care absolutely can have guns, and there are several examples in europe alone.

But you know.... America bad.

[-] Perfide@reddthat.com 14 points 10 months ago

I'm a leftist that's cool with guns and was raised around them, and technically, not legally, owned my first gun at 11.

A 13 year old still should not have access to guns anywhere in public without adult supervision. I get hunting, I get protecting the farm, etc. None of those involve taking a gun on public transport though.

And yeah, America bad. If this was even remotely a significant issue anywhere else, we could say otherwise, but it's not.

[-] some_guy 8 points 10 months ago

America is bad. Just look at the story these comments are about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

The biggest part of gun laws is checking for responsible ownership. You are allowed to get hunting guns in most of the countries that the right says "ban guns". They just have common sense checks, like do you have training at a shooting range, do you understand gun safety, do you have a gun safe, are you not a psychopath prone to fits of violence? Your upbringing wouldn't be any different because your parents were responsible and would have passed all those checks.

This is about not giving a gun to every dumbass yahoo that stumbles into a store. The household this kid grew up in obviously wasn't responsible because this kid has unsupervised access to a gun.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It is legal to hunt at 12 years old in some states.

Edit: I bought enough trigger locks for all my long guns and pistols for under $100. There is no excuse not to have them installed and I live alone. My guns are also in a locker as well as trigger locked. My ammo is in a different room in a safe box screwed to the closet floor from inside the locked box. All this was well under $200 including the gun locker.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago

I need to get some sleep. I read that as

It is legal to hunt 12 year olds in some states

And thought this 13-year old had a gun after the age he needed it for protection...lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago
load more comments (62 replies)
this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
278 points (97.0% liked)

News

23445 readers
5307 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS