40
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
40 points (100.0% liked)
Football (Soccer fútbol fußball 足球 )
5628 readers
35 users here now
Here for discussion of all things association football/soccer!
Rules
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No porn.
- No Ads / Spamming.
Other Football/Soccer Related Communities
- Eredivisie
- MLS
- Football Manager
- Ajax FC
- Arsenal FC
- Chelsea FC
- Liverpool FC
- Tottenham Hotspur FC
- US National Woman’s Soccer League
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Would be a good price for Arsenal though I'm a bit surprised West ham aren't hanging in for more of a bidding war. Maybe they want to get the money to start buying replacements quick
Chelsea have really ruined the market. A few years ago 92m pounds would’ve been a crazy price.
I think PSG is the one who broke the market by signing neymar. His transfer fee is 222 million euro on 2017. After that, player market irreparably broke due to fear of clubs losing talent to oil backed clubs...
Pogba went for about 80 ish million YEARS ago and Rice is a much better player.
Juve Pogba was special though
And Declan isn't?
Of course he is, just "much better" seems like a lot
Isn't he just steadier. A good shield in front of defense but he's not what Pogba was supposed to be. That said, he's undoubtedly a better way to spend 80+ million than Pogba ever turned out to be.
No, he's very good up the pitch too, hell he's the reason why West ham scored the second goal v us
I don't disagree. But he's not what Pogba was at Juventus and I mean the promise of Pogba.
92m?? a good price???
For Rice? Absolutely. He's one of the best CMs in the world, English and only 24. He's a HUGE signing.