612
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The former president — who is facing a mountain of legal woes — is trying to win back the White House on the idea that he should be above the law

Donald Trump isn’t happy that judges on a Washington, D.C., appeals court ruled that he’s not protected from prosecution in the Justice Department’s election interference case against him. The former president has long been claiming he should be immune from criminal repercussions for anything he did while in office — including conspiring to overturn the democratic process — and on Wednesday he posted to Truth Social that a president’s job is so contingent on their ability to commit crimes that it would mark the “end” of “our Country, as we know it,” if they are not afforded that right.

“If a President does not have Immunity, the Opposing Party, during his/her term in Office, can extort and blackmail the President by saying that, ‘if you don’t give us everything we want, we will Indict you for things you did while in Office,’ even if everything done was totally Legal and Appropriate,” Trump wrote, adding that “Obama, Bush, and soon, Crooked Joe Biden, would all be in PRISON. Protect Presidential Immunity. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

...

There’s no evidence that Bush, Obama, or Biden committed crimes while in office, but Trump is under heavy legal scrutiny for an array of potential crimes — most of them tied to his effort to remain in office despite losing to Biden. Trump tried to get the Justice Department’s case against him thrown out last year, alleging he could do no wrong because he was the president. Judge Tanya Chutkan shot down the bid, and Trump appealed, sending the case to the D.C. appeals court. In a hearing last month, Trump’s lawyers argued that immunity should go so far as to protect a president from prosecution even if they were to order SEAL Team 6 to assassinate a political rival.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] YaksDC@lemmy.world 82 points 6 months ago

Does he not realize that if that right is codified before he's president again that Biden could just turn around and have him executed without any repercussions. I don't believe Biden would do that but it just shows that he is not thinking beyond the tip of his nose.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 70 points 6 months ago

I don’t believe Biden would do that

I don't either, but, like, maybe he should?

[-] Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

I volunteer to throw the switch. Or maybe we can do it in Alabama with nitrogen and an ill fitted mask.

[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 13 points 6 months ago

I have two hands, we can suffocate him the old way and save taxpayers money

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

If you make it a PPV event it'll drastically lower the nation's debt in Minecraft

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I like your moxie!

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

There is zero chance it will ever happen but if Trump were executed for his crimes then he should be hanged and his corpse should be left on the gallows on the Mall for a month to show case that in the end he truly had no real power

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

See, that is EXACTLY how Democrats constantly fail...

They think they're Saturday morning cartoon Batman, unable to even kill one measly evildoer... How much faster would Gotham get better if there weren't twenty evil masterminds allowed to run around and escape prison??

Democrats are literally too ignorantly "good" to stand up to evil. They constantly do it on a legislative level, too. They CONSTANTLY let crooks set up traps for them instead of dealing with the crooks.

Just like in any SANE world, Batman would be cheered for mercing terrorists like the Joker and the Riddler and Penguin et. al... In a sane world, Dems would be cheered for barring literel lifetime criminals from running for office...

[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Democrats are literally too ignorantly “good” to stand up to evil.

That's because "process" is all Democrats have.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago

Yep! They're the sort of morons who think signing things in to law magically stops bad people from trying. They'd sit there and shout about the loss of decorum while a terrorist shot every Democrat instead of simply shooting the shooter.

They're the sort of people to think Batman is wise for not being rid of evil people in an environment that has proven to be incapable of controlling them...

[-] steakmeout@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

That process, the decorum you so richly despise is what keeps people from killing you for being such an ignorant loudmouth. People like you never think about the realities of a world where people kill without recourse and everything is an emotional knee jerk reaction with terminal consequences.

[-] YaksDC@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I think we would bar him from running for office if it were up to us and not a corrupt Court.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The Dems could've done a whole lot to expedite the judicial process. When a normal person commits a high crime, they sit IN HOLDING while evidence is collected... Instead, Democrats want to conserve the unjust and unwritten privilege of politicians to avoid justice.

As a result, they are allowing a literal mallicous traitor who literally sold top secret documents free to continue insurection planning. For years. Which lends credibility and legitimacy to the Republicans, even as they literally violate their oaths of office.

The Dems are not powerless. The legislative and executive branches do not have to just sit there and watch the judiciary. The "checks and balances" are not one-way.

[-] cranakis@reddthat.com 12 points 6 months ago

I think he's hoping the timing will work out so that he gets elected first, them SCOTUS grants him supreme immunity.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Is this where we can debate who it would be okay and not okay for Biden to have wacked if this moronically does get codified? Or is that just an invitation to a lot of naughty lists that don't have happy endings?

[-] YaksDC@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

It opens us to purge lists under a less then scrupulous person. I think it would only be a decade before we reached Stalin levels.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Trump's only real platform is Trump.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If you can't commit crimes while in office, on what ground would he have Biden jailed? 🤔

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

He would not need grounds. He would just do.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

I don't believe Biden would do that

I'm prettsure Trump knows this too.

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
612 points (97.1% liked)

politics

18586 readers
4553 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS