564
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A pro-Palestinian protest action briefly blocked all traffic on the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco Wednesday morning.

Starting at about 7:45 a.m. Protesters stopped cars and stretched banners across the roadway denouncing Israel's bombing of Rafah in the Gaza Strip and demanding that the U.S. stop arming Israel.

Northbound and southbound traffic on the bridge was at a standstill as of 8 a.m.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -1 points 9 months ago

The problem with a lot of protests is the protesters don't understand the point of a protest.

Sometimes people get so emotional over a cause they can't understand things from the perspective of other people.

So they end up coming off like selfish crazy people which at best convinces no one, and at worst turns people against their cause.

Many times protests are just about people wanting to be around other people that share their emotions about the cause. This results in a need to find an outlet for these emotions. But because it's an emotional thing they can't think out a logical way to further their cause. So instead it's just about expressing emotion. Which may be cathartic for the protesters but doesn't do anything to further the cause.

Israel is obviously not going to stop until they get the hostages back. Blocking bridges won't change anything. It's just unnecessarily inconveniencing people and only serves to make people think Palestinian movement is an irrational movement that doesn't care about anything other than themselves.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

I'd argue there are no "rational" protests because protests only exist when there is no path to a legal or democratic resolution available.

You don't protest your landlord fixing your broken heating because there's laws saying they have to. You don't protest the elected government, you protest when the elected government breaks the law without recourse.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

I don't think you understand what democracy is. Protest is a right in a democracy, because it can lead to positive change. It's part of the process. A protest can influence elected leaders.

Emotional protests are poorly thought out and can often lead to negative outcomes. You of course have a right to do an emotional protest, but you aren't accomplishing anything.

The Palestinian protests are the worst thought out protests I've ever seen. We just had one this week where I live and they protested a hospital founded by Canadian Jews. So everyone rightly condemned the protest as antisemitic and it didn't help their cause at all. But I guess they got to spend some time with others that are upset by the same thing they're upset about, that seems to be the only thing that's important to them.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Protest is only a right in a democracy because of... well... protest lol. If they banned protests they'd get worse protests than if they didn't, or else they have to murder dissidents (See Russia)

If we could've voted to end the war in Iraq, there would have been no protests about ending the war in Iraq because people would have just gone to the polls.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

What are you on about? There is an entire procedure for lawful protest.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Which is used when there is no democratic or legal recourse to a situation. What is the democratic or legal resource, then, for an average citizen to get their government to publicly denounce genocide in Israel/Palestine?

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I don't believe your question was asked in good faith.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago

it was a rhetorical question because there is none

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Yes literally no lawful way to protest. None whatsoever

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

not what I said, which was:

What is the democratic or legal resource, then, for an average citizen to get their government to publicly denounce genocide in Israel/Palestine?

...

There is none.

Look forward to you telling me what is the democratic or legal resource for an average citizen to get their government to publicly denounce genocide in Israel/Palestine.

[-] HorseRabbit 2 points 9 months ago

What do you think the point of a protest is?

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Apparently to block ambulances

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -1 points 9 months ago

Depends.

The point of a rational protest is to raise awareness and support for a cause. Potentially influence people in power to change policy.

The point of an emotional protest is to simply express emotion without any consideration of achieving any goal.

They Palestinian protests are of the second type. Which is the type of protest that can boil over into violent outbursts which is concerning. Not that violent outbursts will change anything either, no one is going to give in intimidation tactics. But people could be hurt by these protesters.

INB4 the "but they don't hurt people as bad as Israel is hurting people" crowd, who only prove the point that this is all about emotion and nothing else.

[-] HorseRabbit 6 points 9 months ago

Weird dichotomy.

Protests can be entirely rational without the main motivation being recruitment.

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
564 points (95.3% liked)

News

23412 readers
3626 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS