37
submitted 1 year ago by ironsoap@lemmy.one to c/politics@beehaw.org

Article from a few weeks ago, but now that G. Elliott Morris is taking over without Nate's models, I'm curious what lemmy's think about political polling analysis from FiveThirtyEight?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

That's not good. Specifically, I believe Trump beat Clinton because of 538.

[-] KerPop47@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

That's not really accurate. The polls were going back and forth for over a month leading up to the election, and the FBI announce they were re-opening the case into Clinton's emails 3 days before voting day. The polls just didn't have the time to reflect that change.

[-] brognak@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Was it 538, or just the utter idiocy of the average American? Just because the polls say he has a 33% chance of winning, doesn't mean stay home, it means the opposite.

Thems worse odds than Russian roulette.

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
37 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10185 readers
121 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS