598
submitted 5 months ago by rinze@infosec.pub to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Reddit said in a filing to the Securities and Exchange Commission that its users’ posts are “a valuable source of conversation data and knowledge” that has been and will continue to be an important mechanism for training AI and large language models. The filing also states that the company believes “we are in the early stages of monetizing our user base,” and proceeds to say that it will continue to sell users’ content to companies that want to train LLMs and that it will also begin “increased use of artificial intelligence in our advertising solutions.”

The long-awaited S-1 filing reveals much of what Reddit users knew and feared: That many of the changes the company has made over the last year in the leadup to an IPO are focused on exerting control over the site, sanitizing parts of the platform, and monetizing user data.

Posting here because of the privacy implications of all this, but I wonder if at some point there should be an "Enshittification" community :-)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 143 points 5 months ago

Reddit has long had an issue with confidently providing false statements as fact. Sometimes I would come along a question that I was well educated on, and the top voted responses were all very clearly wrong, but sounded correct to someone who didn't know better. This made me question all the other posts that I had believed without knowing enough to tell otherwise.

Llms also have the same issue of confidently telling lies that sound true. Training on Reddit will only make this worse.

[-] itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works 65 points 5 months ago

Yeah all of my most down voted reddit comments were the ones where I replied about something I'm an actual expert in. Scary stuff

[-] const_void@lemmy.ml 57 points 5 months ago

The voting system let's people push comments to the top that they want to be true, not necessarily things that are true.

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 46 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

There's also the issue of reddit comment sorting being entirely dominated by time. In something like 90% of posts, the top comment is one of the first five. Literally all you have to do is just comment first, and it'll likely be the top.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 months ago

I noticed from the beginning that Lemmy's default comment sorting improves visibility of a variety of comments including newer ones. Gee, I wonder who could have helped make it that way ;)

Over the years I ended up getting a Reddit habit of replying to one of the top comments so that it could attain some visibility. I still do sometimes but less often on Lemmy.

[-] Chriswild@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Because it's like old forums where the first person to comment gets engagement

[-] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Some of the better subreddits tried to mix it up and change how this affected upvotes. There was Muxing,..etc etc.. But then,.. Spez came in (back) and didn’t give af about anything at all except money.

[-] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

First time I'm hearing about this, can you give any links? Maybe we could use something similar in lemmy

[-] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Muxing upvotes , “balances”, etc.

Even hiding all upvotes of every comment thread until ~12 hrs after posting.

[-] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

I'm still not sure what those first two mean.

Hiding vote counts is a good idea imo however, having the info visible can influence people's judgement of the comment and cause people to also vote based on the existing score rather than just the comment itself.

[-] federico3@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

This tends to give more influence to people who spend more time on it and write more. And they are less likely to be subject matter experts.

[-] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 5 points 5 months ago

I strongly agree with this comment. To show my appreciation, you have my upvote. Had I only agreed a little bit, I might have not voted at all. If that comment had made me angry, I might have downvoted.

Actually calling these things votes instead of likes makes a lot of sense. I might not like a comment, but I might want it to be higher. I might not hate another comment, but I might want it to be lower because of other reasons.

[-] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago

Downvoting was always just fast food validation that you're better than someone else without having to actually back it up.

[-] execia@lemmy.today 4 points 5 months ago

Wow. You're extremely on point. No logical counterarguments but rather several downvotes for a field I'm very familiar with. Downvotes determine the validity of a comment, not their content.

[-] Krudler@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I spent 20 years as a producer, developer, and project manager in the lottery and games industry.

Trying to explain how lottery and games work to people and have them hear me makes me want to cry.

[-] Chiro@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Fascinating! I’d love to hear a little about it, if you don’t mind.

[-] Krudler@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Certainly, I'm always happy to share with inquisitive minds.

Is there any particular question you'd like me to address?

[-] Chiro@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Not really, I never paid much mind to it. I’m curious about the whole industry I guess, or anything you’d like to share or set the record straight about.

[-] Krudler@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Oh there's lots I have to set the record straight about and there's lots I could talk about, but without being asked a specific question that would just leave me to write an open-ended essay and I'm not up for it right now

[-] blindsight@beehaw.org 26 points 5 months ago

The problem is that SEO has made it impossible to find accurate information easily, since even "old, trustworthy brands" can't be trusted online. [This is an excellent article that explains the problem thoroughly, and brings receipts] (https://housefresh.com/david-vs-digital-goliaths/).

[-] Swallowtail@beehaw.org 11 points 5 months ago

This is a great example of why it's so important to emphasize teaching critical thinking in school right now. Misinformation and disinformation is just going to continue to grow.

[-] blindsight@beehaw.org 5 points 5 months ago

Literally why I bookmarked it. I'm an online teacher, so I'm going to advocate for adding that article to a grade 10 course that's used by thousands of students each year.

[-] Swallowtail@beehaw.org 7 points 5 months ago

I'm a student teacher right now in elementary! I try to get my kids to think critically whenever I can. I hear kids talk about insane shit they saw/heard on tiktok (I got into an argument with a student who thought Slenderman was 100% real because of something they saw on tiktok) and I try to really get them to think and actually justify why they believe things.

[-] BurningRiver@beehaw.org 4 points 5 months ago

An uphill battle for sure. I wish you the best of luck.

[-] blindsight@beehaw.org 3 points 5 months ago

Somewhat related:

A recommendation about teaching controversial topics: you need to build connection first.

I mean, that's true of all teaching, but when you start to question the (prejudiced) things they're hearing from trusted adults at home, you really need to have a strong relationship with the students.

Being an anti-racist pro-SOGI educator in conservative communities is hard.

I wish you success in your career! Teachers have such an opportunity to make a huge impact on the world.

[-] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 months ago

That's a really good article, and it does a good job of highlighting the issues with modern day search results.

I've been guilty to use "best x" pages before, but if the website with the "best of page" doesn't have specific reviews linked I usually look up individual product reviews for the good sounding items on other websites.

[-] nhgeek@beehaw.org 4 points 5 months ago
[-] livus@kbin.social 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

@Fubarberry yes I saw this a lot too. Highly upvoted confidently incorrect comments, with the real answer or an answer debunking them with links to factual sources less upvoted.

Happened to me as well.

[-] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago

I am a lawyer and I would get down voted for posts explaining the law that contained citations to the actual applicable statute if people didn't like the statute. Using reddit up votes as a measure of correctness is fundamentally a dumb idea.

[-] livus@kbin.social 4 points 5 months ago

@collapse_already yeah Reddit also tended to mistake explanation for agreement and savagely downvote it.

[-] Aolley@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

but sounded correct to someone who didn’t know better

specious /spē′shəs/ adjective

Having the ring of truth or plausibility but actually fallacious.
"a specious argument."

and then the real answer will be hidden or something silly, or in some cases where money is involved the correct answer might have been removed

[-] federico3@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

I would come along a question that I was well educated on, and the top voted responses were all very clearly wrong, but sounded correct to someone who didn’t know better.

This can be said to https://news.ycombinator.com/ as well. I wonder how much of this is due to sock puppets and bots.

this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
598 points (98.4% liked)

Privacy

30644 readers
1782 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS