250

I've also seen US teachers spending hundreds of dollars out of their own pockets to stock classrooms.

I spent a lot of time in European schools and I've never heard of teachers having to stock their own classrooms or fundraise for things like playgrounds, etc.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 93 points 5 months ago

Conservatives, mostly.

Conservatives believe in neither education nor government. It's no surprise that when they have power, they fuck up both of those things.

Also racism. A common facet of conservatism. It's part of why conservatives don't like public programs- the wrong sort of people might benefit.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

the conservative point ive been hearing is that government shouldn't spend money on education, because the real problem is fatherless households. im not really sure what to do with it

[-] anemoia_one@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 5 months ago

Make sure abortion is illegal so the number of fatherless households continues to increase, duh

[-] BrerChicken@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

"Fatherless households" is just racist code for black families.

[-] Cort@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Oh, I thought they were going after lesbians

[-] Silentiea@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Black people, gay people, trans people. You know, cool folks.

[-] Silentiea@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Oh and poor people. Definitely poor people.

[-] GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 months ago

That's a smoke screen. Another is the "liberal brainwashing machine" school system scare. What they fear is the statistic that higher educated individuals trend towards populism and progressivism. They see higher education of youths as a threat to their political base, which turns into "spineless parents sending kids to liberul brainwashing camps funded by the gubmnt."

[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Find out what they believe causes a household to be fatherless. Follow their logic string by asking follow-up questions based on their most recent response. Either they'll run out of justification quickly, or they'll back themselves into a corner. From here you can leave it be as they've essentially ended up causing them to question their own understanding.

One way of many.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

they believe it is neo-marxism, atheism, liberalism, black culture, the lgbt movement and its sex positivity. godlessness, basically. "the left" are sodom and gomorroah. no idea how to argue with that because there's not a lot of objective fact in any of it.

[-] Silentiea@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Also find out what consequences they expect a child being "fatherless" to bring, and compare that to what actually happens when a child has a healthy household without a father in it.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 4 points 5 months ago

I mean, if someone is saying that they're probably coming from an afactual, emotional, space, so you'd have to engage with those rules. Try to make them trust you and see you as part of their in-group, because if they see you as an outsider they're extremely unlikely to listen. This is true of everyone, but especially true if someone's emotionally invested in a topic.

Or they're a troll who knows what they're doing. Online trolls you can't really do much about. Real life trolls you can apply social pressure.

If you were going to try to engage that point on facts, which is probably a waste of time, I don't even know where to start. Are there statistics backing their claim or is it just made up entirely? Is it a dog whistle for racism? Have they read "The New Jim Crow"? Why does this problem preclude spending money on education? If fatherless households were a problem, should the government address that? How so? Would investing more in education be a long term solution to this problem, too?

There are so many questions. Most of which are likely to be wasted because the person holding this position is likely uninterested in facts, but has some feelings they're justifying with words.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

if you asked ben shapiro he would probably suggest subsidies for religious private schools, religious leaders in government, policy based on religion, changes to family law, enforced marriage upon pregnancy and that sort of thing

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 5 months ago

Those are all terrible ideas. Shapiro is some combination of stupid and evil though, so this would be on brand.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

welcome to about half of americans

this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
250 points (96.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

34916 readers
2276 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS