229
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yhvr@lemm.ee 141 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I hate to be that guy, but it doesn't seem like there's anything to this fork. At least a few links in the README don't work, and the domain for the "email" is actively for sale. The owner of the repository doesn't seem to have any real previous projects on their GitHub account.

I can understand that it's a new fork, but in my mind you'd want to at least make sure the Readme is... passable before you spread the word and make a Patreon for the project.

EDIT: The Patreon link has been removed since I made this comment. I'm still incredibly skeptical of the project though

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 73 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I would say don't make a freaking patreon for it. You know what companies hate even more than people using thier IPs? Getting money while doing it.

[-] IllNess@infosec.pub 48 points 9 months ago

This looks like a straight cash grab. I bet the whoever owns this github won't work on it at all.

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah... I looked at the project's subreddit, and I don't expect it to last long. The creator's idea of avoiding Nintendo's legal team boils down to "assert emulation is legal and condemn piracy within our dev team and community."

I don't mean to be a dick, but I don't think the guy knows what he's doing. The only way an actively-maintained fork is going to avoid the same fate is if they either give up before Nintendo cares, or:

  • Stripped out the code that gave Nintendo's argument validity in the first place;
  • Did not make money off the project; and
  • Stayed far the hell away from retail game emulation, focusing on perfect compatibility for homebrew entirely.

 

Even then, there's a good chance they're screwed either way. The original Yuzu devs agreed to Nintendo's terms of explicitly naming Yuzu as a circumvention tool. Settlements don't serve as precedent, but I suspect it's going to be extremely hard to argue that a minimal derivative of a circumvention tool is not still a circumvention tool when the original creators stated they designed it as such.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago

Yep. We need a separate completely anonymous "pastebin special" program that can decrypt these games.

[-] Lord_Nikon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago
[-] yhvr@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago

I'm sure a lot of forks will pop up right around this time. I'll be less skeptical of them once I see actual commits made to the codebase instead of things like just changing the readme

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
229 points (84.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55056 readers
318 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS