320
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Didn't he say something about a 2 state solution being the eventual goal?

[-] juergen 11 points 9 months ago

Yes, he has been saying this. What is lacking is a plan to get there. Against the opposition of the current Israeli government.

[-] S_204@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

How does the American president develop a plan when one side is refusing to even say if the hostages are alive and acknowledge the existence of the other party?

It's so weird that people act like Hamas/Palestinians aren't required to be a part of the process..... when they're the ones who have turned down the deals Egypt and Qatar have brokered.

[-] OppaGundamStyle@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 9 months ago

Hamas is part of the process, they have attended the negotiations.

Fact is Israel is the one who keeps refusing to participate.

[-] S_204@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

Israel won't negotiate until they get a list of names of living hostages. That's what's being negotiated, Hamas won't provide it. Blaming Israel because Hamas won't come to the table in any reasonable way is ridiculous.

The Qatar's have threatened to boot Hamas if they don't start negotiating in good faith is the news coming out lately. Blaming Israel for not negotiating over nothing is just stupid.

[-] OppaGundamStyle@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Israel cannot get a list of names until they stop bombing the place and shooting everyone.

How is Hamas meant to go out and find out who's even survived Israeli bombings if they get killed? Even ambulances with Israeli permission to rescue young children aren't even safe to travel the streets.

[-] norbert@kbin.social -2 points 9 months ago

Israel won't negotiate

You could've stopped there.

[-] S_204@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Meanwhile Qatar is threatening to boot Hamas because they're not negotiating in good faith.

Your narrative doesn't match reality.

[-] norbert@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

Bad faith negotiators all around, hard to blame Biden.

[-] S_204@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Yet the squad and their backers are finding ways to undermine their own..... interesting how that works.

[-] norbert@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago
[-] juergen -2 points 9 months ago

Right. The principal parties of such negotiations are the Israeli- and the Palestinian Government, with Hamas in the mix, because they control the Gaza Strip.

Anyone outside those groups can make suggestions, demands, etc., but there are limited means for them to influence such negotiations. The US government can threaten to withhold support (at the risk of being labeled antisemitic or at least anti Israel), but I wouldn't bet my bottom dollar that it would make a difference in this climate.

I did not mean imply that Biden and his government can make a plan, and expect it to be followed. However, I feel that for his own benefit, Biden has to make a public display of making stronger demands for a resolution of this problem. It may not fix things in the Middle East in the short term, but it will demonstrate that he cares, and that the USA cares.

[-] S_204@lemm.ee -2 points 9 months ago

That's fair, I would probably agree with most of how you have reframed that. I think the qataris have an outside influence and obviously Iran's input would mean something.

I think Biden bringing Gantz over for a chat is about as big of a threat to Bibi as you're going to see though. That's notable on many levels.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

He says a lot of things. He's supporting Netanyahu's genocide by selling him weapons and backing him up at the UN.

His support for a 2 state solution consists of words.

[-] DarkDarkHouse 3 points 9 months ago

The two state solution here seems to be a border with Israel on one side and Egypt on the other.

[-] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

This is just willful ignorance at this point, the administration has been saying consistently since at least a month after October 7th, that a two state solution was the only answer to permanently solve the crisis.

[-] DarkDarkHouse 12 points 9 months ago

Contrast what is being said with what is happening. Gazans are being pushed hard against that Egypt border. They are being starved and killed. Where does this end if US watches it continue?

[-] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago

And yet they will do nothing to make it happen, just like every administration before them. At what point will you care that it's just lip service?

this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
320 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19248 readers
2297 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS