346
submitted 9 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

U.S. Rep. Katie Porter became a social media celebrity by brandishing a white board at congressional hearings to dissect CEOs and break down complex figures into assaults on corporate greed, a signature image that propelled the Democrat’s U.S. Senate candidacy in California.

The progressive favorite known for spotlighting her soccer mom, minivan-driving home life was trounced in Tuesday’s primary election to fill the seat once held by the late Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, finishing far behind Republican Steve Garvey and fellow Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff.

Porter didn’t go down quietly. She immediately pointed a finger at “billionaires spending millions to rig this election.” That claim resulted in a brutal social media backlash from many who were happy to depict the congresswoman as a graceless loser.

Perhaps chastened by the criticism, Porter later clarified her initial statement to say she didn’t believe the California vote count or election process had been compromised, but she didn’t recant her earlier remarks. Rigged, she said in a follow-up, “means manipulated by dishonest means.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] natecox@programming.dev 32 points 9 months ago

I’m a California constituent, and the idea of Adam Schiff representing me over Katie Porter makes me physically ill.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 9 points 9 months ago

And thousands of others prefer it, apparently.

[-] natecox@programming.dev 17 points 9 months ago

Do they? Or does spending millions of dollars campaigning simply effectively manipulate?

The media is a powerful tool, controlled basically exclusively by money.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

How do you define manipulate VS convince?

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

Spreading lies vs the truth?

Just a guess.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago

Were there any lies spread in this case then?

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

You asked how I'd define it so I did.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago

In the context of someone being accused of manipulation to win an election. If they lied it could be, if not maybe they just had a better message.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago

I'd be careful of this "I am immune to propaganda" line of thinking.

You're basically accusing everyone who didn't vote the way you wanted of being brainwashed fools, and that's how the progressive bloc spectacularly failed to capture the black vote in 2016 and 2020.

If your line of thinking forgets that the other person is a person who is actively making decisions, and who's agency is not changed for deciding differently than you did, you're wrong.

That's how we get white progressives insisting that gun toting Redcaps will totally join the progressive cause if the gays and the POC and the women would all just shut up and stop talking about identity politics.

[-] natecox@programming.dev 7 points 9 months ago

You’re reading a lot into things I did not say.

An appeal to popularity without a critical eye on the impact of massive media spending is far more dangerous than what you’re accusing me of.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

You’re reading a lot into things I did not say.

It's what he does.

this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
346 points (96.5% liked)

News

23625 readers
3328 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS