409
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

House Speaker Mike Johnson had no idea Representative Ken Buck is quitting, as the GOP is in complete shambles.

Representative Ken Buck took to social media to announce his near-immediate leave from Congress, resigning so fast that even his party leaders were caught off guard by the decision.

“Today, I am announcing that I will depart Congress at the end of next week,” Buck said in a statement on Tuesday. “I look forward to staying involved in our political process, as well as spending more time in Colorado with my family.”

The less-than-two-weeks notice took practically everybody by surprise, including (or maybe especially) House Speaker Mike Johnson.

“I was surprised by Ken’s announcement,” Johnson told a crush of reporters inside the Capitol building. “I look forward to talking to him about that.”

“I didn’t know,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 138 points 7 months ago

Buck's reason for leaving seems stupid to me (paraphrasing) "I believe our election system is broken so I want to join a group to fix it".

Dude, you're in the legislature!! Introduce legislation changing it!

[-] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 170 points 7 months ago

Man is also a member of the party responsible for the dysfunction, don't forget that.

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 69 points 7 months ago

Freedom Caucus member as well

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 41 points 7 months ago

lmao, the dude was the dysfunction!

[-] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 18 points 7 months ago

The dysfunction was coming from inside the House the whole time!

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 6 points 7 months ago

In a week he will have freedom from congress!

[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Exactly. This may just open the door for yet another idiot, making things worse for all of us. They need to fix gerrymandering.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 15 points 7 months ago

Good news, 4 states will have new, fairer maps this upcoming election cycle.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 20 points 7 months ago

I mean, this is darkly foreshadowing to me. I don't understand how he could have more subversive influence outside of Congress than in, but I'm sure something is fucky.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 21 points 7 months ago

My guess is that he sees a massive loss for the GOP coming up and figured it was smarted to leave now then get crushed in the landslide.

Of course, it could be something completely outside politics, but I know how I'd bet.

[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 7 points 7 months ago

He already announced a while back he wasn’t running for re-election, but who knows maybe he just didn’t see the point to keep going.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

A quick search tells me that a Congressional seat can remain vacant for up to six months because there has to be an election. The Governor of a State appoints a new Senator if the current one resigns. It's nine months until November. I don't know what his plan was, but he's created quite the pickle for the rest of the local power structure.

[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Governor called a special election to coincide with the date of the primary in June. So the parties will pick two candidates and then CO-4 will pick a house rep for 6 months and then another election for a full term in November. The real question is if it means bobo the clown will leave her current seat to run which would mean two special elections. But first the party has to nominate her

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

Silly me. I assumed it was a Super Tuesday state that had already had their primary.

To me, it sounds like the one who resigned is doing some real fancy footwork behind the scenes. If he'd already said he was stepping down he almost certainly had a successor in mind.

If you enjoy pure nut cutting politics, may I introduce you to Washington reporter turned crime novelist Ross Thomas. "The Fools In Town Are On Our Side" is about a disgraced CIA operative who is hire to make a small Southern city so corrupt that "even the pimps will vote for reform."

"The Porkchoppers" is about a Nixon Era union election. It has characters ranging from Mafia hit men to sleazy political operators to White House consultants.

[-] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

Are you a bot lol. Colorado is weird but it votes for president primary during Super Tuesday but other positions have their primary in June. I do think Ken buck resigned to make it as inconvenient as possible for boebert. The party gets to pick the candidate for the primary, and she has to resign to run. They could manipulate her into resigning and not pick her to run lol I do feel like he is intentionally trying to sabotage her

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

I'd like to chat with some Rocky Mountain State political junkies about the whole Bobo vs. Buck deal.

Even if I were a hard core Tea Party MAGoo I'd be ashamed of Bobo's antics, and would want her out.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

In general totally agree. That particular quote is odd however. Probably there to pique interest with folks just as it did me.

Edit I'm a fucking idiot guy.i replied to wrote "(paraphrasing)"

[-] grue@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

Or Hell, even just voting with the Democrats would help.

[-] magiccupcake@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

While I agree, the nutters out there would have started death threats daily. I don't blame him for not wanting that treatment.

But maybe congress could be in a position to change that.

[-] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Except he's part of the reason people feel safe to make death threats.

He is running from the consequences of his actions.

[-] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 14 points 7 months ago

He was elected by that system! They're as dumb as a pocket full of lint.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

less useful, though. Lint can be used as a firestarter.

[-] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Well, they are doing a pretty good job burning down their own house.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

“Only you can prevent wildfires. Vote Democrat”

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Considering climate-change-induced drought, that's not even metaphorical.

[-] hansl@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Are you insinuating that Ken Buck is inflammable?

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Being inflammable would give him at least one use.

[-] hansl@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Inflammable means flammable? What a country!

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

not necessarily. it specifically means easily set on fire.

This guy is useless, which means he sucks as a fuel source (to difficult to set on fire, too little energy returns), but is flammable enough that he can't be used as a fire resistant material, either.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Or you can make it into paper.

this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
409 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19016 readers
4454 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS