And? From many biological perspectives mice are rather similar to humans. And very easy to test these kinds of things. Not everything will translate 100%, but more often then not they are useful.
magiccupcake
Nah, apartments are supposed to be great. For one you can buy and own apartments.
Renting is supposed to be a viable alternative to houses. The tradeoff is supposed to be slightly more expensive, but no worries about any kind of maintenance, and higher flexibility about moving.
The reason this whole equation is so fucked is because we don't have enough apartments (really all housing) to house everyone where they want to live, so purchasing or renting housing is obscenely expensive.
And the main problem stems from zoning
A lawsuit forced krafton to rehire the fired devs, and extended the the payout period based on sales.
So ironically, for maximum hurt for krafton, you should buy the game to force a larger payout.
Where are they gonna go? We destroyed most of our third places, or made them so expensive to extract maximum profits.
Dinner is expensive, movies are expensive, small friendly local shops have been disappearing in favor of sterile corporate ones.
For a lot of people the only option would then be a home, which doesn't work great for a lot of reasons.
I mean you do have a messaging problem. Your leadership has received bad messaging about what "AI" can do!
Ironically the reason we can't keep up with car infrastructure is because there's too much of it.
It much more costly to maintain, especially when scaling to more lanes.
Reducing space given to cars and giving more to bikes/buses/trains would make it easier to upkeep our current roads.
No offenses, but I'm gonna put a lot more weight behind a peer reviewed Nature paper, rather than some random podcaster.
The explained their methodology pretty well. They extrapolate the microplastics amount from a small bit of cortical tissue, and compared it to previous results. Yeah there might not be as much in other parts of the brain, but we don't have a reason to think it would be drastically different.
Neither are really bread as they are not leavened with yeast.
Based on Wikipedia I think the unit is milligals, where a gal is 1 centimeter per second squared.
That is a bit of an odd unit where g is ~980,000 milligals.
So these changes are extremely small.
So then the total variation is all within about 0.02% of gravities normal value
Newton's laws, including gravity and motion, can be expressed in terms of differential equations.
Differential equations pretty much requires calculus, which just hadn't been formalized yet.
Newton's laws also provide convincing reasons for the necessity and legitimacy of calculus, by being able to derive orbits from his simple laws.
For this kind of study, we are really not that much different from mice.
We share 80% of our DNA with mice. We share many similarities in our immune systems, brain, and yes even gut.
The study uses mice to try and find a mechanism of ageing in humans, and they test their theories on mice. They do find a mechanism! It is rather unlikely that the mechanism they find does not apply at all in humans.
If we didn't use animal models to try and understand human biology our models, medicine, drugs, etc would be far far worse.
For example see: https://www.blood.ca/en/research/our-research-stories/research-education-discovery/why-do-scientists-use-mice-medical