828
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Two members of the Orange Unified School District board have been removed by parents who opposed a policy requiring school staff to out transgender kids.

Parents in Southern California have voted to remove two conservative school board members after they spearheaded a policy that forcibly outs transgender students to their guardians. 

Members of the Orange Unified School District board voted 4-0 to enact the policy in September. It was passed at 11:30 p.m., after the three opposed members walked out and withheld their votes. 

The policy states that parents must be notified when a student seeks “to be identified as a gender other than the student’s biological sex or gender listed on the student’s birth certificate or any other official records.” This includes names, nicknames, and pronouns, and applies even if the student hasn’t taken action but has discussed the matter with a counselor.

At the initial meeting in September, the board was overwhelmed by crowds who showed up to either protest or support the policy. However, the majority of the attendees voicing support did not have children in the district's schools, and most were not residents of the area, according to the Times.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 37 points 8 months ago

And yet, local media has become such shit that it’s impossible to research the positions of many local candidates.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 16 points 8 months ago

During the last elections here, the media sent out questionnaires to all of the school board candidates and half of them didn't bother to respond.

The local subreddit crowdsourced background info on all the candidates and helped identify several of the wingnut wannabe authoritarians.

.

Though one did manage to get elected and almost immediately got suspended for acting like the racist she is during the meetings, and then freaking out when called out for her behaviour.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

League of women’s voters website is usually a good resource. They send each candidate a questionnaire and publish what they get back.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I've emailed local candidates and asked them how they voted on other elections (like who did you vote for president or in the primaries). They've responded. I have had some respond very vague, which I interpret as a bad sign, and others were very clear.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

If they don't want to say, they either voted Republican or are afraid to be transparent (or both). Either way, they need to be voted out.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

You might be shocked at how accessible local politicians can be. It astonishingly easy to get into local politics.

Show up, introduce yourself, shake hands, rinse and repeat. You'll soon get to know who's who and how the tides are moving. You'll see who has influence, and why, learn from there.

LOL, you got me thinking about jumping back in. Locally, some people got together to fight an initiative we didn't like. Nobody powerful or monied, but they won.

this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
828 points (96.9% liked)

News

23422 readers
2585 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS