213
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 149 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

He killed the man who had molested him for years not as revenge, but because he HAD STARTED TO MOLEST HIS 6YR OLD NEPHEW.

He should have NEVER gone to prison, much less be deported.

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I mean it's a grey area. Giving them no jail time opens up a basket of approved vigilantism. On the other hand the system failed him already so why would he go back to them. This isn't a cut and dry case

[-] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago

I thought we all needed guns for self defense? Or are we done pretending that's a thing and are just admitting they're only for killing minorities now?

[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 6 months ago

We have approved so much more vigilantism than this. Your house is your castle in so much of the US.

[-] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

A serial child rapist was actively molesting his 6 year old nephew. That's defense of others, not vigilantism.

[-] die444die@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

What do you think vigilantism is?

[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 points 6 months ago

That's literally definition vigilantism

[-] Thermal_shocked@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Whole episode of rescue me based on this.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 99 points 6 months ago

He had been strangled, then doused with lighter fluid and set ablaze.

I think that's measured. The rapist, Galdamez (let's call it for what it is) had not only raped Flores several times, but done the same to several other children. From the article it seems like the last straw was when the rapist was to move in to take care of Flores' nephew. Batshit insane.

There's so much that went wrong here but I don't think you can blame a kid for setting fire to his abuser. Hell, it seems like he did it to protect others. It's not his fault, he would've gone for help had he felt like help would be given, the fault lies with society.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 6 points 6 months ago

Yep. If the justice system doesn't want people removing child molesters from their lives themselves then it needs to do a better job. Too many stories of these motherfuckers raping multiple children and getting a slap on the wrist only to do it again when they get out. Marco made the world a better place and should be praised.

[-] CosmicApe@kbin.social 54 points 6 months ago

He shouldn't have even been in prison

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

Hell, he should’ve been given a medal.

[-] Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago

Spare his deportation? Hell, give this guy a TV show and make him the new Chris Hansen.

[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 18 points 6 months ago

Pedo shows up.

Lights shut off.

"Why don't you have a seat"

:panicked gibbering:

:neck snap noises:

[-] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 27 points 6 months ago

Man does world a favour and is threatened with deportation.

Hilarious.

[-] OmenAtom@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago

Yep, hell make a fine citizen

[-] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

He shouldn't have been arrested, let alone at threat of deportation.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

He should be given an award.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 points 6 months ago

Y'all are really overlooking the most important thing here, which is that he was born in another country. /s

this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
213 points (95.7% liked)

News

21850 readers
5205 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS