this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
144 points (98.0% liked)

News

36063 readers
4463 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Surgeries for minors are rare and are generally not recommended by medical associations, most of which oppose broad bans on transition-related care.

Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine announced an executive order Friday that will immediately ban transition-related surgeries for minors in the state, about a week after vetoing a bill that would have banned all gender-affirming care for minors, including puberty blockers and hormone therapy.

“A week has gone by, and I still feel just as firmly as I did that day,” DeWine said at a news conference Friday, reaffirming his decision to veto the broader ban. “I believe the parents, not the government, should be making these crucial decisions for their children.”

DeWine’s executive order makes Ohio the second state to specifically ban transition-related surgeries for minors after Arizona passed such a law in 2022.

Since 2021, more than 20 states have enacted broader transgender health care laws like the one DeWine vetoed last week. These measures restrict all gender-transition care for minors, including access to puberty blockers and hormone therapy. A judge struck down such a law in Arkansas in June, and judges have issued temporary blocks, either partial or full, against restrictions in Florida, Georgia, Montana, Idaho and Indiana.

Major medical associations — including the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Psychological Association — support minors’ access to gender-affirming care and oppose state bans.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nothing like performative legislation that does (almost) nothing other than turn on a spotlight on the latest group to be hated and dehumanized.

[–] NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

On the other hand, doesn’t this take the wind out of the sails of most of the anti-trans block’s arguments? With this “what-if” banned all of the remaining arguments are pretty clearly irrational, religious, or generally indefensible.

This is obviously an enormously complicated topic that there's a lot of misinformation and opinions out there on, but ultimately speaking my problem with it, other than the fact it will very obviously be applied in a discriminatory way, is that bigots don't stop pushing because you give them an inch.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm guessing intersex kids are still going to still going to have surgeries performed on them without their consent, though.

[–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago

I'm in no way equating the two because non-consensual surgeries on intersex kids have potential to be far more damaging, but I'm sure infant male genital mutilation will continue as well.

[–] quindraco@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

This executive order specifically bans those, assuming the state of being intersex is relevant to the surgery and the surgery is cosmetic.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They gonna ban jetpacks next? Maybe a ban on breeding snipes? Ohio is going to pass the superhero registration act?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Jetpacks are a thing now though

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, but exceptionally rare. Anyone who has one is probably an outlier, and banning them from schools, for examle, would be a waste of time.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

eh... you may not have noticed, but jetpacks are real now. they've been around in various forms for a few years and are getting kinda impressive.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Gender affirming surgery is also real. It is almost never performed on minors, but can be performed on intersex minors. Except not in Ohio anymore apparently.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But i guess they are going to continue cutting off parts of male infant genitalia....

[–] thatgirlwasfire@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well sky daddy says to do that, so we must listen to sky daddy.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's worse because most of that in the US isn't done in the name of religion but of tradition based on pseudoscience. There isn't even an invisible man excuse.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's like corn flakes or graham crackers... It's only around to keep crazy people from masturbating.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

How is that even something that falls under the authority of an executive order? Seems like pretty dubious legal ground anyway.

[–] Froyn@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What about intersex infants?

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 9 points 2 years ago

Imagine being born with ovaries but no vagina. Does that happen? I'm pretty sure the Republican plan for them would be to wait until they are dying of sepsis before taking the minimum necessary steps to keep them alive.

[–] veloxization@yiffit.net 16 points 2 years ago

Yes, let's outlaw a thing that barely happens at all. Because that's the most important issue that needs to be focused on.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Are we going to regulate by law medical treatment now? This is the party of "small government"??? More like party of "Culture warriors".

[–] bouldering_barista@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Of course coming right after the victory on HB68 getting shot down (thankfully!).

Because surgeries are very rare for anyone under 18, I think the bigger impact to DeWine's order is the requirement of youth or ADULTS needing to have psychiatric care AND endocrinologist involved as pre-reqs before starting any kind of medical care. This is a bigger deal because some people will be blocked by the religious therapists out there, and in smaller communities finding and endo can be hard and more expensive. This definitely hurts the trans community.

[–] Womdat10@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

And just when Ohio was starting to pass some good laws, this happens.