50
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

But Haley’s surge is revealing of a broader problem for Trump—one that could potentially derail the former president in the general election should he defeat her in the primary.

Women, including Republican women, still just don’t like the former president.

A recent survey of likely voters in New Hampshire distills the extent of the challenge for Trump. The poll, conducted by American Research Group, showed Trump beating Haley overall among GOP primary voters, 37 percent to 33 percent.

But among Republican women, Haley was running ahead of Trump by 6 points.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] neptune@dmv.social 31 points 10 months ago

Centrists in 2016: we shouldn't make Hillary Clinton the first female president. It'd make women look bad.

Centrists in 2024: Nikki Hayley as a response to Trump's sexism and other failures? To be our next president? Seems fine.

[-] ZahzenEclipse@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I think you misunderstand what centrists are or I do.

[-] neptune@dmv.social 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The Centrist™️ might be best personified by the old Englightened Centrist subreddit.

Basically, it's not someone who smokes weed on Friday, shoots at the shooting range on Saturday, goes to church on Sunday, and then volunteers at planned parenthood on Monday.

A Centrist™️ is someone who believes truth is found at the fifty yard line. They think if Trump wants to ban all Muslims coming into the US and his opponents do not, then maybe we should just find a way to screen Muslims extra hard. They believe every single word they read in a newspaper. They voted for Romney and then Trump and can't understand why, based on their policy and tone differences, this might appear super racist to a lot of Americans. The Centrist famously thinks pro life and pro choice are morons, we should just let women decide. The Centrist thinks Elon Musk is smart because he's an independent and a job creator. The Centrist was a boring capitalist twenty years ago, fell asleep, didn't realize how late stage shit got and how far fascist Republicans have become. The Centrist likes to say "but both sides" do x! (x might be "fundraise on abortions/guns")

Thanks for coming to my TED talk.

Continued: a Centrist (in this context) is NOT a liberal who is skeptical of the democratic party. A Centrist is not someone who has policy ideas not espoused by either party.

[-] ZahzenEclipse@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Okay so centrist isn't essential relabeling of a moderate liberal - then I probably agree with that.

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago
[-] ZahzenEclipse@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Nah I'm pretty sure they are coming at the centrist label from a far left perspective. I don't know any centrist who think the republican party is reasonable right now. I know right wing moderates who like Haley but they aren't centrists.

[-] chakan2@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

But among Republican women, Haley was running ahead of Trump by 6 points.

Um...that's not exactly the landslide they make it out to be. In short, a heavy percentage of Republican women hate women.

[-] AnxiousDater101@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Nikki Haley is dumber than a bucket of hair. Why are you even talking about her?

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 15 points 10 months ago

"Dumber than a bucket of hair" still puts her ahead of the rest of the GOP primary candidates.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 9 points 10 months ago

Because if anyone has a shot at beating Trump in the primary, it's her. It's still a long shot, sure, but if she got the nomination (because a certain someone got kicked off enough ballots), Biden could potentially lose his not-Trump voting bloc.

And she's still the same level of christofascist that would happily implement Project 2025, but she's much better at hiding it to win over the moderate conservatives.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

More importantly, if anyone other than Trump wins the Republican nomination, Trump will run as an independent and split the vote.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Well that would be a good thing right? More competitive votes would be split between Haley and trump rather than Biden and anyone else.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 10 months ago

Not if SCOTUS tells the insurrectionist to go fuck himself. There's a decent chance they slap him down by March.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

You have greater faith in the legitimacy of the supreme court than I do.

[-] CalicoJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

If a dictator takes over, they lose their own power. It's in their own best interests to rule against Trump this time.

[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Mrs. "I had black friends"

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

A long, drawn out primary fight could drain resources that would otherwise fund a general election campaign. And I don't think it would take long to get bitter and personal, which could turn off independents, but might also cause supporters of the losing candidate to stay home or vote third party.

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

remember the porn that came out with an actor cosplaying as Nikki Haley during her first run

not able to find a link but big news at the time and well done

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Why would we care? Even it it was literally her, if everyone is consenting, I don't give a fuck what she does in her free time.

I have lots of reasons to dislike her, or any other politicians, but having a consenting sex life is not one of them.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

His bowels?

this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
50 points (82.9% liked)

politics

19145 readers
4637 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS