this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
204 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

34334 readers
12 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to their website, Publications owned by GAMURS Group include:

Destructoid

The Escapist

Siliconera

Twinfinite

Dot Esports

Upcomer

Gamepur

Prima Games

PC Invasion

Attack of the Fanboy

Touch, Tap, Play

Pro Game Guides

Gamer Journalist

Operation Sports

GameSkinny

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago

Guess we now know why Nick from The Escapist was fired. They think GPT can do it better.

[–] SemioticStandard@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is fucking gross. There’s no one who thinks people will read the mass shit they pump out.

[–] AineLasagna@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A lot of sites like these are already just click farms with “articles” consisting of a headline and a couple poorly-researched sentences. Switching to AI probably won’t significantly change the quality of what they’re churning out.

[–] SemioticStandard@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago

Right. That’s why searching for anything on the internet SUCKS these days. The results are all just filler bullshit.

[–] Nullroad@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Something to keep in mind is that these companies aren't concerned with total profit or revenue or anything like that - it's all about the percentage. I suspect in the short term, these AI-articles will look very profitable. Networking effects, consumer habits, and SEO will carry the day for a time.

But what always screws these MBA types is the inability to recognize the specific natures of their business and the second order effects. Not all costs are representable on a spread-sheet.

Basically, the second order to me really boils down to this: AI generated content isn't really a 'brand'. Good writing shops tend to build a following with their writers and expectations with their editors. The writing, investigative, and editorial bent of a house is essentially what makes a shop. See The Economist and The New Yorker as examples. In other places, a lot of niche shops are selling personality as much as product with youtube, podcasts, and others.

this means there is no real 'value add' someone like an AI shop can provide. You are throwing yourselves down the hole of becoming a pure commodity, and as every business major knows, being a commodity sucks. Short term profitable, but literally no one cares about where a mass produced nail comes from and its a race to the bottom of price.

So, as time goes on, with the barrier for entry being incredibly low, every bill and joe who fancies themselves an SEO wizard has no reason to not jump in, so your competition rises and your ability to charge some value for (ads?) drops a lot. But that's the tip of the iceberg. Many of the companies that would occupy this brandless, commodity-filling space are way better positioned to make a run at it than the GAMURS Groups of the world. Microsoft's Bing chat and (probably soon to follow Bard) will whip your ass in the long-game. Why search Bing to get an AI article from the Escapist when Bing will do it for me? I really doubt anything churned out by an AI with some edits will be that much better per convenience.

This whole could easily collapse in on itself. Like a lot of people in the AI space, I'm interested to watch what happens when AI begins to consume and be built on its own content.

[–] SemioticStandard@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

Basically, the second order to me really boils down to this: AI generated content isn’t really a ‘brand’. Good writing shops tend to build a following with their writers and expectations with their editors. The writing, investigative, and editorial bent of a house is essentially what makes a shop. See The Economist and The New Yorker as examples. In other places, a lot of niche shops are selling personality as much as product with youtube, podcasts, and others.

Yep. This is why I've been a paying subscriber to Ars Technica for over a decade. You're exactly correct. Ditto with NPR.

[–] Cylinsier@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The enshitification of the internet continues. How can we offer our content, but without having to pay anyone for it and at a much higher rate of delivery? By not giving a fuck about the quality anymore and not having any real competition so people have no choice. Except people always have a choice. We can walk away.

[–] Pegatron@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I don't see why people would even go to a site to read AI generated articles and be bombarded with ads. I could just ask an AI to write an article for me? Just cut out the middle man at that point.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

The sites don't mention the AI authorship, so you go there to read an article, likely one you found linked elsewhere, only to be baffled by the ramblings.

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

I don’t see why people would even go to a site to read AI generated articles and be bombarded with ads.

Doesn't have to be voluntary on the user's part. Maybe they clicked a link on Google? Or maybe a site they've been reading for ages suddenly switches to "AI editors" and it's never really announced to the users in a clear way

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ondoyant@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

I'm just waiting until these models get completely unraveled by training on output. The more people use generative AI to make stuff online, the more useless the internet is as a data source.

[–] JZshark@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Considering how many blogs are just AI generated garbage now, it doesn’t surprise me that the big players are looking to automate their articles.

The issue is that AI can’t really create… it just remakes what it already knows and has seen before. No hot takes. No new ideas. Just whatever has been done before.

Hopefully this isn’t the new way everything goes…

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Content farms have been polluting the web for years, to the point that search engines are near totally unreliable. But this new wave of AI-powered content farms, and even worse, AI-driven content from once respected and trustworthy orgs, is going to make things exponentially worse

[–] Harold@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Agree 💯 What's wild is that it's been taught that you have to use 'established' publications for reliable and accurate information. AI (in)famously can just make things up, and it's going to be at major sites

[–] EremesZorn@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yo, I don't mean to get all John Connor or anything, but we need to put a stop to and legislate against AI. Full stop.
We already see how it's being misused.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SteelCorrelation@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So now I know which sites to ignore completely from now on.

[–] rockprada@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Probably wouldn’t hurt to blacklist links from sites known to produce only AI generated articles.

[–] Lowbird@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

I want a ublock origin list for this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] coldhotman@nrsk.no 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] 4815162342@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

Sure, flush your websites reputation down the toilet. Good luck with that.

[–] 1984@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

Ugh, not The Escapist. I mean you see a lot of AI written articles nowadays so it will only ramp up, but it's still bad.

[–] oaklandnative@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And I just unsubscribed from the Escapist and Destructoid RSS feeds. What a bummer. Thanks for the heads up!

[–] ozoned@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

More help from companies on letting me know the websites to stay away from. This isn't the first time DToid did stupid crap. Back on Justin.tv, maybe they had converted to Twitch already, they had a BUNCH of streamers that were ruling the platform, then they said that their streamers would have to review and give positive reviews of sponsored games. All the streamers left the group and Dtoid lost a TON of traction and Twitch exploded from Justin.TV.

[–] Den_The_Grem@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This may be a little tangential, but does anyone know of any game news sites with RSS feeds that have talented writers working for them? Some of the sites I've followed for years have been regurgitating Twitter opinions more and more, and it makes finding thoughtful (or just plain informative) articles far more difficult.

[–] sky@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you like MMOs and other multiplayer games, https://massivelyop.com/ is very good. Talented writers funded by reader donations.

[–] Den_The_Grem@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

I've been following that publication for a while, actually, and I agree. They're a great team.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] irongamer@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

"250 articles a week..." So they are just transitioning to creating spam? Never read any of those sites but focusing on output just sounds like spam. #filtered

[–] Wiredfire@kayb.ee 0 points 2 years ago

It’s pure clickbait farming. The article doesn’t need to be any good as long as the headline gets a click and just enough seconds of attention for the ad space to be profitable. Zero journalistic integrity, just gaming the numbers >:-(

[–] GolGolarion@pathfinder.social 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So... these sites are all just random text generators now? What's the point?

[–] pgetsos@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Cheaper to produce clickbaity articles. Most of these websites are already just trash "articles" made for clicks

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 0 points 2 years ago

This juxtaposed with all the teachers failing students for using generative AI tells you a lot about the world we live in.

[–] ledtasso@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

We as humans are already sensationalizing content for clicks. I can’t imagine what content is going to look like even in the near future with AI at the reigns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] landsharkkidd@aussie.zone 0 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I know game journalists are memed on, but this is really disappointing. AI will eventually unravel and crap out because it's regurgitating AI content.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›