230
submitted 7 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Brian Chaney says he asked for a supervisor during his arrest in Keego Harbor, Michigan, and Police Officer Richard Lindquist told him that another officer present was in charge. The problem: That second officer was not a supervisor or even a member of the Keego Harbor Police Department.

Lindquist was never disciplined and his chief says that while a suspect has the right to request a supervisor, what the officer did was OK.

“An officer can lie in the field when he’s not under oath,” Keego Harbor Police Chief John Fitzgerald said in a deposition in Chaney’s $10 million wrongful detention lawsuit.

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 58 points 7 months ago

“An officer can lie in the field when he’s not under oath,” Keego Harbor Police Chief John Fitzgerald said in a deposition in Chaney’s $10 million wrongful detention lawsuit.

Their excuse for this is usually that they wouldn't be able to do undercover work if they had to tell the truth. And, to me, it doesn't seem unreasonable to suggest that if they have to lie in the field to do something like undercover work, they have to get a judge to sign off on it first.

[-] valaramech@kbin.social 32 points 7 months ago

I generally agree with the stance that undercover cops should be allowed to lie, since failing to do so would defeat the purpose of being undercover. However, an officer actively arresting someone using their authority as a police officer should be required to be as truthful as possible with the person detained.

I'll stop saying "defund the police" when "protect and serve" is actually what they do.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

I agree completely. That's why I said a judge should have to sign off on it. An officer actively arresting someone could not legally lie in that scenario. Only cops in specific scenarios where judges approved of it could lie. That would be far from perfect, there are plenty of rubber stamp judges, but it would also be a lot better than what we have now.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago

Undercover work is minor for the reason cops like to be able to lie. It's more about obtaining confessions. If cops were punished for lying, it could cause thousands of confessions obtained under false pretenses to be called into question.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

And how many of those confessions were of innocent people coerced that way?

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago

A lot more than anyone wants to admit.

[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 9 points 7 months ago

And how useful is anyone if everything they say is probably a lie? Is that someone the public should trust?

[-] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago

I'm shocked that 43% of their respondents have such high regard and trust for cops, but the downward trend is becoming more rapid.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 20 points 7 months ago

43% is about the percent of the US population that leans Republican. Simple farmers. People of the land. The common clay. You know. Morons.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

What surprises me the most is they allow their hate for the Democrats to dictate their vote for the GOP, instead of using knowledge and wisdom to decide for them ... and then justify it by parroting Trump's idea that he's some kind of martyr and fighting for their rights.

I just can't understand how people can slide so far down the slippery slope of false belief without hitting some kind of bump that wakes them up.

[-] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Somebody's got to go back and get a shitload of dimes

[-] white_shotgun@aussie.zone 6 points 7 months ago
[-] Zeon@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

All Cops Are Cops!

[-] Tenthrow@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Something’s gotta give eventually

this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
230 points (97.5% liked)

News

22831 readers
4143 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS