106
it will label nine of the thousands of PFAS “forever chemicals” as hazardous.
I see the industry has had a say.
There is a point that maybe we need to do things a different way. All complaints aside, EPA regulates chemicals one by one: how do you even handle classes of thousands of chemicals?
Personally I would consider all of them unsafe until they are identified. Pretty sure that's how pharmaceutical drugs are handled so I'm not sure why it would be different for chemicals we don't know about. If the process is to slow then it's obvious the EPA needs a bigger budget and staff to work on this, instead of when Trump tried to cripple it even more than it already is...
I don't know how the EPA regulates in particular but you can describe PFAS by their definition which uses the common components that give them the properties they have.
Environmental Pathetic Agency more like it, what a weak fucking proposal.
Then vote for someone who will put a more robust EPA policy in place. Senate, house, president.
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
106 points (99.1% liked)
News
23650 readers
2462 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS