150

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez issued a warning to Joe Biden on the border (www.newsweek.com)

submitted 4 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 22 points 4 months ago

I have such a schoolboy crush on her. She'd be my Trump. "Oh, you shot some people in Manhattan? You poor thing, that must have been a lot! Who needs a long hug?"

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 14 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez issued a warning to President Joe Biden following reports he may use new executive action amid an uptick in migrant arrivals at the U.S.-Mexico border.

Republicans have blamed his policies for the increase, though experts note external political and economic factors play a substantial role in driving migration.

Ocasio-Cortez, a progressive Democrat representing New York's 14th Congressional District, slammed the idea in a post on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, Wednesday night.

Ocasio-Cortez said that Biden should "refuse to sign" this executive order, describing its "mere suggestion" as "outrageous."

In December, the president faced backlash from some progressives over his negotiations with Republicans to reach a deal on immigration and border security that has since been blocked by conservatives.

"The base of the Democratic Party—young people, folks of color, immigrants—that was the coalition that allowed Joe Biden to get elected....

The original article contains 497 words, the summary contains 147 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

I don't really know what the solution is but messaging needs to be better. I talk to so many people who worry about these issues and a lot of them are on the left. There needs to be a clear plan for how to ensure any problems are mitigated and idealism isn't a solution

[+] shalafi@lemmy.world -15 points 4 months ago

There were more than 2.4 million encounters at the U.S.-Mexico border during the 2023 fiscal year, up from roughly 1.7 million in 2021, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data.

That's a shitload, above and beyond "normal", of real humans and families we have to deal with. They are not political footballs. Pretending there is no issue because the GOP is campaigning on it is ignorant and borderline evil. Real people are hurting, both inside and outside the US.

https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/southwest-land-border-encounters

I don't have answers, but I see the problem. And if anyone wants to present a simple answer to me, I'll call you simple.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 26 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

That's less immigration than during Bush Jr.'s term, simply with better enforcement. The country didn't fall apart then, it's not falling apart now. And since you post this link and argument every time the border comes up, I'll just cut and past the link that shows this isn't a record level of immigration. It should be familiar, as you've seen it before.

The annual total — which includes people who were stopped at the border more than once — jumped by 37% from 1.7 million the year before.

That isn’t to suggest 2022 saw the largest number of people trying to enter the U.S. illegally. For instance, the Department of Homeland Security estimates that there were nearly 4 million unauthorized border crossings in 2000 but only 1.6 million were counted. Over the years, immigration authorities have been able to track more migrants as a result of improved security technology.

https://www.npr.org/2022/10/24/1130841306/new-record-in-border-patrol-apprehensions

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

And yet the Republicans claim he's not doing anything

[-] CouncilOfFriends@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

These discussions also can't ignore any time a Democrat is in the White House, Republicans declare the border is open and then refuse to do anything about it because it would violate their primary directive of obstructing Democratic presidents.

[-] Hoomod@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

There was a bipartisan bill in the senate they worked on for months, it included funding for Ukraine etc because Republicans said it had to be tied to border security

Right before going for any votes, the trumplicans said they would vote no on it because it had funding for Ukraine etc

Republicans don't want to fix the problem, because then they can't complain about it

this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024

150 points (89.9% liked)

politics

18114 readers

3592 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News