-43

Democrat/Republican they still keep the status quo, like all presidents before.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 19 points 8 months ago

Yeah, fuck The Constitution. Who needs that b.s. anyway?

[-] Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Downvoted to oblivion or a reign of comment fire from the lemmy hive on this one? Maybe both!

I disagree with you and I’ll leave it at that.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

It's really just not a very good unpopular opinion post. It's literally the mainstream position of one of our two main political parties.

Which makes it a fairly meh troll post.

[-] squid_slime@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

America need a shake up of the democratic system. It doesn't look very democratic from the outside with weird swing states and two party system

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

No he won't be able to run, and you can't help it.

Has Usa ever had a prez who was walking with a cane?

:-)

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 8 months ago

That is a principle of a democracy. Open and fair elections.

[-] Cheems@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Except the constitution exists. And when you try to overthrow our government and install yourself as a dictator you lose that privilege.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The Constitution of the United States also requires due process before punishing people. That would require a court of law, specifically a criminal court, or even the Congress. To come to a judgment and issue a felony against the candidate. To my knowledge that has not happened, so according to due process in the rule of law, they should be an eligible candidate to be voted on.

Otherwise, we're capriciously and arbitrarily, not following our own rule of law, and the democracy is not open.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 months ago

It says “engage” in insurrection, not “convicted”, because if there is an insurrection, the courts are not able to function normally, and those engaged in insurrection are evading the normal legal process.

Sound like any candidate you know?

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

as a society ruled by law, I would expect a court of law to make the determination if such conduct was engaged.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 months ago

That’s why courts are kicking him off the ballot for engaging in insurrection.

But some people are demanding he receive special treatment, and must not only engage in insurrection but be arrested, tried, and convicted.

The founding fathers recognized that’s not always possible in an insurrection.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 8 months ago

Great. The rule of law works. Now it just needs to be a federal court

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago

So do you retract your original claim that a conviction is required to “engage” in insurrection?

Do you believe DJT engaged in insurrection?

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I absolutely do not retract my claim. But Court needs to make the determination. That determination would be a conviction. Or used in the furtherance of a conviction.

I have no judgment about whether the candidate performed an insurrection or not. If you're asking my personal opinion I don't like him. I don't want him to be president.

I want the rule of law to govern the electoral system. Which means we need to work by findings and not emotions

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago

Why does DJT deserve special treatment of requiring a conviction, when that’s not what the law says?

It seems most of us are reading the plain english of the law, and some people are tying themselves into pretzels to argue Trump is above the law.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 8 months ago

Because the judicial system is how the law makes a finding of fact.

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
-43 points (19.7% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6216 readers
393 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS